Per Lindström wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Is this correct?
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/44366201
Looks correct to me.
> Should this be added to the wiki?
You could add it to the examples section:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_conditions_for_access_
Mike Harris wrote:
> IMHO it would be more useful if bicycle=no meant 'no cycling' ... I think
> there are quite a few situations where a cyclist could wheel (or carry) the
> bike but not ride it. Without bicycle=no it would be difficult to know that
> it was 'no cycling' but with 'bicycle=no' + '
Mike N. wrote:
>> - bicycle=no -> you are not allowed to ride a bike
>> - bicycle=prohibited -> the presence of bikes is not allowed
>> - bicycle=folded_only -> you can have a folded bike
>>
>> I would hope this covers most cases.
>
> There is the odd case of fragile and protected n
Erik Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Cartinus wrote:
>> On Monday 07 December 2009 16:23:06 Stephen Gower wrote:
>>> A routing engine should use these paths for foot
>>> traffic (during daylight hours - another problem!)
>>
>> I've used "opening_hours=sunrise to sunset". Mostly
Chris Hill wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> I'd tag a section marked as "cyclists must dismount" as a footway,
>> bicycle=destination (since there's no way in hell you'd want to take a
>> route that bogus as anything but a last resort).
>
> Except that in Hull, UK two of the National Cycle Network
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Ambiguous. Paris has a far different idea about business hours than New
> York, which has a different idea than Salem, and so on. Even within the
> same geopolitical region, for example, "business hours" are typically
> 8AM-5PM M-Sa in P
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Ambiguous. Paris has a far different idea about business hours than New
>> York, which has a different idea than Salem, and so on. Even within the
>> same geopolitical region, fo
2009/12/6 Steve Bennett
>
> cycleway=barrier
> cycleway=separated_lane
> cycleway=kerb_separated
>
you might also want to have a look at this draft:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tag
