2009/11/30 Martin Fossdal Guttesen
> how do i tag/draw a connection between 2 islands, it is not a bridge as i
> understand a bridge
>
> take a look at the pictures on this page if you dont know what i mean
> http://landsverk.fo/default.asp?sida=718&bolkaid=6&projectid=299
>
>
yes, it's not a b
2009/11/30 Mike N.
> I keep running into small uncovered areas by one or more building walls
> that
> may have flowers / grass / or small bushes , but can be all brick / stone.
> We refer to them as plaza or courtyard here, and many of them are named.
> I
> can't find a tag that fits well - the c
2009/11/30 Martin Fossdal Guttesen
> if you look at the description of embankment on the map features page
>
> "An embankment is an artificial bank raised above the
> immediately-surrounding land to redirect or prevent flooding by a river,
> lake or sea"
>
> then i don't think it is an embankme
2009/11/30 Ed Avis
>
> A house would be building=yes or perhaps building=house. But for a block
> or a
> larger area, yes, tagging the landuse is fine.
>
I'd suggest to tag detached house differently from terraced houses and other
typologies, e.g. building=detached (currently 1425 uses accordin
On Monday 30 November 2009 15:39:30 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2009/11/30 Martin Fossdal Guttesen
>
> > if you look at the description of embankment on the map features page
> >
> > "An embankment is an artificial bank raised above the
> > immediately-surrounding land to redirect or prevent fl
I'm not sure I understood the WIki correctly - either that, or Osmarender
doesn't do what the wiki says. In this place [1], the railway runs on a
raised finger of land, as described in the wiki. So I put two parallel ways
on both sides of the railway and tagged them as embankments; but the
resultin
2009/11/30 Cartinus
> On Monday 30 November 2009 22:09:10 Martin Fossdal Guttesen wrote:
> > I would agree that it is more like a Causeway jugding from the wikipedia
> > article and images, but i cant find any tag for that, and i dont think it
> > would render on the map
>
> so what? I'm sure it
2009/12/1 Steve Bennett
>
> I've referred to "Jurisdictions" a few times for this reason. I imagine US
> states are possibly even more individual. Would we go as far as
> councils/municipalities? Probably not. (Although, as I mentioned somewhere
> earlier, the City of Melbourne prohibits bike rid
On Monday 30 November 2009 23:36:27 Simone Saviolo wrote:
> I'm not sure I understood the WIki correctly - either that, or Osmarender
> doesn't do what the wiki says. In this place [1], the railway runs on a
> raised finger of land, as described in the wiki. So I put two parallel ways
> on both sid
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Cartinus wrote:
> On Monday 30 November 2009 23:36:27 Simone Saviolo wrote:
>> I'm not sure I understood the WIki correctly - either that, or Osmarender
>> doesn't do what the wiki says. In this place [1], the railway runs on a
>> raised finger of land, as described
10 matches
Mail list logo
