On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Liz wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> I should probably point out that not all roundabouts are one-way.
> That's a traffic circle
>
> I have researched this point..
>
>
> Liz
Here is the definition of "traffic circle" in wikipedia:
"A traffi
2009/11/28 Pieren :
> excepted in some cases in US. The problem with implied values is when
> it is not true for a whole country and not only in a small number of
> exceptions. Then the default is country specific and should be
> documented separetely in the wiki for each country. Then it will be
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Name one road type which is inherently one-way.
>
Roundabouts, Motorway slip roads in the UK, half of a dual carriageway,
bus guideways...
My point was about newcomers to the project, who haven't sat in on
endless tedious tagging discussions (and may have no wish to do
> I'm doing a lot of mapping of pedestrian and bike paths around my
> area, and am having trouble deciding when to use path, when footway,
> and when cycleway. I'm particularly troubled by the way Potlatch
> describes "path" as "unofficial path" - making it sound like an
> unpaved line of footprint
Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Richard Fairhurst
>
> wrote:
> > highway=footway -> a path intended for pedestrian use
> > highway=cycleway -> a path intended for pedestrian and cycle use
> > highway=bridleway -> a path intended for pedestrian and horse use[1]
>
> Boy, I
2009/11/28 Jonathan Bennett
>
> My point was about newcomers to the project, who haven't sat in on
> endless tedious tagging discussions (and may have no wish to do so)
> assuming that because every instance of a type of road they know is one
> way that it's an inherent property. Showing their as
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Jonathan Bennett
wrote:
> My point was about newcomers to the project, who haven't sat in on
> endless tedious tagging discussions (and may have no wish to do so)
> assuming that because every instance of a type of road they know is one
> way that it's an inherent
