lcn = local cycle network (used in some countries, notably Belgium and the
Netherlands, for circular tours, in other countries for fairly
short-distance routes), rendered DARK blue
rcn= regional cycle network (used for a "node" network in the Netherlands,
used for various sub-national routes in ot
2009/11/2 Randy
>
> I did look up the definition of tunnel in my Webster's Unabridged, and
> will concede that, that particular dictionary did seemingly restrict it to
> underground. However, in the verb form it defined creating a passage under
> or through something.
So I guess if you tunnel th
Anthony wrote:
>2009/10/13 Martin Koppenhoefer
>:
>>IMHO landuse=military is already what you want to express with
>>boundary=military.
>
>Then all the landuse=military tags can be changed, and
>landuse=military can be deprecated.
>
>On the other hand, ownership=military and/or access=military ma
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Randy wrote:
> To me, in the US, boundary=military makes sense from the perspective that
> a military base is usually under federal jurisdiction, rather than the
> state and local jurisdiction of the political/administrative boundaries
> around it.
I don't like th
Anthony wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Randy
> wrote:
>>To me, in the US, boundary=military makes sense from the perspective that
>>a military base is usually under federal jurisdiction, rather than the
>>state and local jurisdiction of the political/administrative boundaries
>>around i
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>Here is some examples (talk-de) what some people think to be accurately
>tagged as tunnel whilst it will obfuscate the database if we would.
>
>http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Br%C3%BCckenrasthaus_Frankenwald
>
>this one is not rendered correctly if just using layer=1 on t
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Randy wrote:
> Anthony wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Randy
>> wrote:
>> I'd rather see "boundary=federal enclave"
>>(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_enclave) or something like that
>>to represent this.
>>
>>You'd still likely want something=milit
2009/11/2 Randy
> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> >Here is some examples (talk-de) what some people think to be accurately
> >tagged as tunnel whilst it will obfuscate the database if we would.
> >
> >http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Br%C3%BCckenrasthaus_Frankenwald
> >
> >this one is not rendered cor
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
In general, I think we're in agreement, although I do have a slightly more
liberal view of tunnels than you. I certainly wouldn't tag above ground
tunnels without what I consider a really good reason. Since your second
example,
http://www.blogwiese.ch/wp-content/emm
2009/11/3 Randy
> I might also tag a short section of the highway as "covered" in your first
> example, http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Br%C3%BCckenrasthaus_Frankenwald.
> Granted, that would be tagging for the renderers, because I am aware they
> have a real technical problem with properly renderin
10 matches
Mail list logo
