Re: [Tagging] [OSM-dev] Proposition: Toll amount - roads, tunells, ferry routes, bridges, etc...

2009-11-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/10/31 Marjan Vrban > I have an idea, but i'm no programmer :-) > > How about implemeting toll amount into ways that require payment, so > routing engines could calculate toll cost for some route. It would be in > local currency and convertable to other (e.g. 100HRK=13,83 EUR). > Tolls by veh

Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-11-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/10/31 Randy > >I'm still not sure if my example should be tagged with "tunnel" or > >not. To my mind something doesn't become a tunnel just because you > >build something over top of it. According to the wiki, "The tunnel > >tag is used to map ways that runs through an underground passage.

Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-11-01 Thread Anthony
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2009/10/31 Randy >> Secondly, if adopted strictly, if forces the creation of a >> separate tag with identical functionality for the above ground case. > > Which does make sense. A tunnel going underground can be crossed mostly > without

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] NY Bicycle Routes

2009-11-01 Thread Richard Welty
[i'm new to the tagging discussion, just joined, please bear with me] On 11/1/09 7:13 PM, Adam Glauser wrote: > Sam's message has me somewhat confused as to who said what. In terms > of cycling tagging in North America, where the legal framework is > fairly similar* most places, my approach has

Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-11-01 Thread Randy
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >>I think "underground" is an unfortunate qualifier on tunnels, and I'd like >>to see it removed. > > >no. > > >>First of all, it's inaccurate. Look at the online >>dictionaries. > > >no, don't look at "online dictionaries" when talking about technical issues >that ar