Hi
I'm wondering what is best practice regarding tagging addr:housenumber
and POIs, e.g. amenity=restaurant.
Let's assume that on Mainstreet 10 there's a restaurant named Thai
Wok. Should there be one node or two?
One single node with the tags addr:street, addr:housenumber,
amenity=restaurant and
2009/10/15 Markus Lindholm :
> Hi
>
> I'm wondering what is best practice regarding tagging addr:housenumber
> and POIs, e.g. amenity=restaurant.
> Let's assume that on Mainstreet 10 there's a restaurant named Thai
> Wok. Should there be one node or two?
> One single node with the tags addr:street,
Hi,
please join the opinion poll about the landuse=orchard proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/orchard
Pieren
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Randy Thomson wrote:
> Sounds good Martin. I have about 3000-5000 houses to tag, I'll tag the
> beginning and ending house addresses, on each street, if you'll tag the
> 15-20 individual houses in between. They're in the satellite images, so
> it shouldn't be a pro
2009/10/14 sly (sylvain letuffe) :
> In the holes continuity, it as been proposed that an area representing
> something inside another area would still be part of a multipolygon relation
> but with it's own tags.
no, this is not the case. Multipolygon says: the inner part is NOT
part of the outer
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> well, even in the case lake inside a forest I'm not sure, if the
> forest stops where there is the lake. Probably you can consider the
> lake also part of the forest (when it's small), or to give a different
> example: elementary school inside a residential area. Usuall
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Randy Thomson
> wrote:
>> Sounds good Martin. I have about 3000-5000 houses to tag, I'll tag the
>> beginning and ending house addresses, on each street, if you'll tag the
>> 15-20 individual houses in between. Th
2009/10/15 Peter Childs :
> 2009/10/15 Markus Lindholm :
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm wondering what is best practice regarding tagging addr:housenumber
>> and POIs, e.g. amenity=restaurant.
>> Let's assume that on Mainstreet 10 there's a restaurant named Thai
>> Wok. Should there be one node or two?
>> One sin
2009/10/15 Dave F. :
> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> well, even in the case lake inside a forest I'm not sure, if the
>> forest stops where there is the lake. Probably you can consider the
>> lake also part of the forest (when it's small), or to give a different
>> example: elementary school inside
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Markus Lindholm
wrote:
> I guess the follow-up question then is: what if there are multiple
> POIs that have the same addr:housenumber? Should it be duplicated on
> all the POIs?
If you're going to add a distinguishing address feature, such as
"addr:suite=*", you
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> well, elementary schools belong to a residential area as well as a
> (not to big) convenience store that serves mostly this area or a pub.
> At least to "general residential areas" according to German law
> (BauNVO, WA = allgemeines Wo
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> no, this is not the case. Multipolygon says: the inner part is NOT
> part of the outer polygon.
I didn't say that ;-) I said :
"an area representing something inside another area would still be part of a
multipolygon relation" (I assumed pe
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> For the lake in the forest: do you agree that someone would say: the
> lake (pond) is in the forest? Like a way in the forest, which doesn't
> have trees growing on it, but still is in the forest. It is not
> excluded.
That's a human language
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:56 AM, sly (sylvain letuffe)
wrote:
> On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> let the mappers decide.
>
> So we do agree. My point was to stop or not to stop harrassing mappers that do
> not include inner polygons.
We can not harass them, but still asser
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:56 PM, sly (sylvain letuffe)
wrote:
Are you suggesting that when a landuse is inside another landuse, we
just don't use a multipolygon relation and don't care if the big is
overlapping the small ?
But we are not modelling the reality in this case. If someone or some
soft
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2009/10/15 Dave F. :
>
>> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>>> well, even in the case lake inside a forest I'm not sure, if the
>>> forest stops where there is the lake. Probably you can consider the
>>> lake also part of the forest (when it's small), or to give a
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:30 PM, David Earl wrote:
> Because it is likely to be useful to my local authority in a real world
> project, I am considering adding some tags to schools to classify them,
> something like this:
>
> operator=Somewhereshire County Council
>
> school:level=early|first
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Anthony wrote:
> We can not harass them, but still assert that doing so is wrong, can't we?
We can, but "should we ?"
--
sly
Sylvain Letuffe li...@letuffe.org
qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org
___
Tagging mailing lis
Anthony wrote:
>
> What happens when there's a section of forest which people are using
> as their residence?
No matter what the size, I see these as mutually exclusive. In other
words they can't both occur in the same place.
Whether they get mapped like that is up to the mapper depending
time/fu
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:24 PM, sly (sylvain letuffe)
wrote:
> On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Anthony wrote:
>> We can not harass them, but still assert that doing so is wrong, can't we?
> We can, but "should we ?"
If it's wrong, then yes, we should.
Deciding that landuse areas should never overlap
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Dave F. wrote:
> Anthony wrote:
>>
>> What happens when there's a section of forest which people are using
>> as their residence?
> No matter what the size, I see these as mutually exclusive. In other
> words they can't both occur in the same place.
I fully agree
Anthony wrote:
> The problem with the landuse tag is it's being used for multiple
> things. On one hand, it's being used to describe what the land is
> being used for - if people are using the land as their residence, the
> land is tagged landuse=residential. On the other hand, it's being
> used
On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Pieren wrote:
> Are you suggesting that when a landuse is inside another landuse, we
> just don't use a multipolygon relation and don't care if the big is
> overlapping the small ?
Not suggesting, exploring solutions. I'm probably missing elements, but I feel
it could be
Anthony wrote:
> add a fixme=create_hole tag and a bot could go around fixing them...
Hi Anthony
Does this exist or is it a wish list item?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sly (sylvain letuffe)
wrote:
> But my point is also toward another consideration :
> Mappers will tend to walk that way, and nothing can stop them. You can't force
> a mapper to add a thousand small lake in a forest to an inner polygon. Let's
> now ease our pain a
Hi multipolygon masters,
How would you tag some island-rich Finnish lakes, for the one here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=62.1747&lon=28.6278&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF
Currently big lakes in Finland have been tagged as coastlines which is a
good workaround and looks correct in slippy maps. How
At least from what i understand...
I wouldnt use the tag natural=coastline simply because coastline becomes
confusing when your getting to the 'coast' where there are lots of islands..
im still working on it, but i do have a shp file for the islands (just not
imported yet)
http://www.openstreetma
Hi everybody,
as i'm keeping a strict kosher life, i'm interested in mapping the
kosher status of any food related amenity big_smile
any restourant, butcher, ice cream shop, candy shop, bakery and so on
could be a kosher place and i would be able to search kosher places near me.
But there are ma
2009/10/16 Edoardo 'Yossef' Marascalchi :
> Hi everybody,
> as i'm keeping a strict kosher life, i'm interested in mapping the
> kosher status of any food related amenity big_smile
>
> any restourant, butcher, ice cream shop, candy shop, bakery and so on
> could be a kosher place and i would be abl
John Smith ha scritto:
> There is no kosher tag there.
>
>
there is now.. i just sent the mail before to add it .. :D
> I'd just tag the place as:
>
> kosher=yes
> hallal=yes
>
i don't know about hallal but there are many different kosher
certifications. If you are ultra-orthodox you would'
2009/10/16 Edoardo 'Yossef' Marascalchi :
> John Smith ha scritto:
>> There is no kosher tag there.
>>
>>
> there is now.. i just sent the mail before to add it .. :D
>
>> I'd just tag the place as:
>>
>> kosher=yes
>> hallal=yes
>>
> i don't know about hallal but there are many different kosher
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
