Re: [Tagging] How to tag house numbers based on decametres?

2009-10-11 Thread SLXViper
John Smith wrote: > I can't think of a good solution for this, a few years ago they > renumbered all properties along roads outside of residential areas to > be the distance in decametres (10s of metres, 100m would be #10 etc) > from the start of the road, they also have even on the right, odd on >

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skippednumbers

2009-10-11 Thread Tobias Knerr
Anthony writes: >>> What is one supposed to do if the number of houses is unknown? Do I >>> need to propose an >>> addr:interpolation_as_the_word_is_defined_[...] >>> to handle that situation? Yes, you are trying to express something that is different from what I'm trying to tag, so we should use

Re: [Tagging] How to tag house numbers based on decametres?

2009-10-11 Thread John Smith
2009/10/11 SLXViper : > John Smith wrote: >> I can't think of a good solution for this, a few years ago they >> renumbered all properties along roads outside of residential areas to >> be the distance in decametres (10s of metres, 100m would be #10 etc) >> from the start of the road, they also have

[Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread Richard Bullock
> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown. The wiki page for the Karlsruhe Schema on interpolation has said this since the day it was created; "For missing house-numbers (e.g. missing "12") two ways need to be drawn (e.g. "1-11" and "13-25"). " I.e. if you have the first house #

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread John Smith
2009/10/11 Richard Bullock : >> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown. > > > The wiki page for the Karlsruhe Schema on interpolation has said this since > the day it was created; > > "For missing house-numbers (e.g. missing "12") two ways need to be drawn > (e.g. "1-11" and "13-25").

Re: [Tagging] Approximate addressing solutions

2009-10-11 Thread Anthony
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > Yes, you are trying to express something that is different from what I'm > trying to tag, so we should use different tags to do so. I thought about this overnight, and, okay, you're right, we should use different tags. I wouldn't want to lea

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread Richard Bullock
> 2009/10/11 Richard Bullock : >>> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown. >> >> >> The wiki page for the Karlsruhe Schema on interpolation has said this >> since >> the day it was created; >> >> "For missing house-numbers (e.g. missing "12") two ways need to be drawn >> (e.g. "1-11"

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread Anthony
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Richard Bullock wrote: > If you type in a house number on the same street that does exist, it > takes you to the interpolated position of that house. Why do you think that's an interpolated position? I see no evidence that it is. In fact, I see evidence that it'

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread Anthony
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Richard Bullock wrote: > I was replying to the assertion by Anthony that interpolation doesn't > specify which house numbers are present between two numbered nodes - just > that some unspecified number is present. I was wrong. I assumed the word "interpolation" w

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skippednumbers

2009-10-11 Thread Randy Thomson
Richard Bullock wrote: > > Or even we could just use > > addr:interpolation=x > > to mean that only every x numbers are included between the first and > last > > So 1,5,9,13 could be tagged addr:interpolation=4 > > That seems like a reasonable suggestion and a simple extension of the > exist

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] mapnik shelter rendering

2009-10-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/10/11 Dave F. : > I think you maybe confusing > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Shelter > with > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Alpine_Hut no, I don't, alpine huts are bigger places, sometimes with "restaurant-like" features and beds, while shelters

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] mapnik shelter rendering

2009-10-11 Thread Dave F.
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2009/10/11 Dave F. : > >> I think you maybe confusing >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Shelter >> with >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Alpine_Hut >> > > no, I don't, alpine huts are bigger places, sometimes with > "

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Google has dual carriage way where it's not built yet

2009-10-11 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/10/10 OJ W : > multiple plans would overlap each other and look weird? look weird where? I guess these would not be rendered in standard maps (or just in advanced planning phases and for main plans like motorways, airports, etc.). I made a proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pla

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread Richard Bullock
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Richard Bullock wrote: >> I was replying to the assertion by Anthony that interpolation doesn't >> specify which house numbers are present between two numbered nodes - just >> that some unspecified number is present. > > I was wrong. I assumed the word "interpo