2009/10/8 Shaun McDonald :
> There is nothing wrong with mapping each lane even when it is two way, as
> that is effectively what it is as I doubt you'd be allowed to do a u-turn on
> most of those examples.
There is continuous discussions about this, and generally we agreed
that you shouldn't do
2009/10/9 Bráulio Bezerra da Silva :
> I agree with you. Every single map of my city I've seen has some "planned
> roads" where in reality we have a forest or something else. These roads are
> in the "oficial map" of the city plan made by the authorities and are
> promptly copied to comercial maps.
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2009/10/9 Bráulio Bezerra da Silva :
> > I agree with you. Every single map of my city I've seen has some
> > "planned roads" where in reality we have a forest or something
> > else. These roads are in the "oficial map" of the city plan made by
> > the authorities and
I addressed this topic in the Karlsruhe discussion page, but didn't get
much constructive input. Maybe it's more of a US problem. Still I
thought I should bring it here, since tagging has been split off from
general Talk.
In Fort Worth, TX, (pop. approaching a million) in a large number of
the sub
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Randy Thomson wrote:
> Then you are proposing
>
> highway=planned
> planned=* (highway class)
>
> Is that correct? Sounds OK to me.
Make sure you get permission from the designer of the plans - in the
form of a release under CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, or into the public dom
Randy Thomson wrote:
> I addressed this topic in the Karlsruhe discussion page, but didn't
> get much constructive input. Maybe it's more of a US problem. Still I
> thought I should bring it here, since tagging has been split off from
> general Talk.
>
> In Fort Worth, TX, (pop. approaching a mil
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anthony wrote:
>>
>> Even then, I have mixed feelings about it, until there's support in
>> the major editors for downloading and editing subsets of data.
>
> First of all, this would have to be supported by the API as well. And it is
Randy Thomson:
>> Consequently, in single family dwelling areas, with even/odd
>> numbering, the numbering sequences go 00, 04, 08, 12, etc. for even
>> (N/W), and and 01, 05, 08, 13, etc. for odd (S/E) house numbering.
>>
>> [...] I have a
>> suggested scheme of adding an interpolation subkey,
>>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Randy Thomson wrote:
> Randy Thomson wrote:
>> Consequently, in single family dwelling areas, with even/odd
>> numbering, the numbering sequences go 00, 04, 08, 12, etc. for even
>> (N/W), and and 01, 05, 08, 13, etc. for odd (S/E) house numbering.
>>
>> I don't kn
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> My suggestion is to use a new interpolation value; something like
> interpolation=step + step=4 (step=2 would produce the same result as
> odd/even, depending on the house number it starts with; step=1 would
> have the same effect as all).
I'
Anthony writes:
> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown.
I don't agree with this statement. I'd assume that an interpolation=even
between numbers 8 and 42 means that EVERY even number between 8 and 42
is represented by this way. (With the exception of numbers that are
tagged on indi
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> Anthony writes:
>> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown.
>
> I don't agree with this statement. I'd assume that an interpolation=even
> between numbers 8 and 42 means that EVERY even number between 8 and 42
> is represented by
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anthony wrote:
Even then, I have mixed feelings about it, until there's support in
the major editors for downloading and editing subsets of data.
>
>>> First of all, this would have to be supported by the API as well. A
Granted the number of buildings can be unknown, but is the number of
valid addresses unknown? In my case, the second address is not valid,
and will never be valid, unless a house is torn down and a duplex is
built in its place, which might (or might not) require a zoning change.
--
Randy
__
Anthony wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Tobias Knerr
> wrote:
> > My suggestion is to use a new interpolation value; something like
> > interpolation=step + step=4 (step=2 would produce the same result as
> > odd/even, depending on the house number it starts with; step=1 would
> > have
Anthony wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Tobias Knerr
> wrote:
> > Anthony writes:
> >> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown.
> >
> > I don't agree with this statement. I'd assume that an
> > interpolation=even between numbers 8 and 42 means that EVERY even
> > number be
Tobias Knerr wrote:
> Anthony writes:
> > In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown.
>
> I don't agree with this statement. I'd assume that an
> interpolation=even between numbers 8 and 42 means that EVERY even
> number between 8 and 42 is represented by this way. (With the
> exception
Tobias Knerr wrote:
> Randy Thomson:
> >> Consequently, in single family dwelling areas, with even/odd
> >> numbering, the numbering sequences go 00, 04, 08, 12, etc. for even
> >> (N/W), and and 01, 05, 08, 13, etc. for odd (S/E) house numbering.
> > >
> >> [...] I have a
> >> suggested scheme o
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Randy Thomson wrote:
> Anthony wrote:
>> If you know where
>> all the individual houses are, why bother with an interpolation?
>
> My answer to your first question is a labor saving of anywhere from 2
> to 10-fold for the mapper. I'm talking about thousands of hous
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Randy Thomson wrote:
> My answer to your first question is a labor saving of anywhere from 2
> to 10-fold for the mapper. I'm talking about thousands of houses.
And what about the labor savings when I try to map a few hundred strip
malls with addresses like this (
2009/10/11 Anthony :
> That's my point though. I'm not sure we should allow "proposed" or
> "historical" data unless and until OSM supports the features of
> traditional layers. Perhaps there is a way to be smarter about it
> (allow links between layers but warn when they are broken), but I'm
> n
I can't think of a good solution for this, a few years ago they
renumbered all properties along roads outside of residential areas to
be the distance in decametres (10s of metres, 100m would be #10 etc)
from the start of the road, they also have even on the right, odd on
the left, this makes it eas
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Randy Thomson wrote:
> Of course, there are many places, mostly in commercial land-use areas
> that meet your example of widely and irregularly spaced numbers. I
> wouldn't attempt to use interpolation in such a situatation, but would
> either tag a building outline or a buildi
Anthony wrote:
> I didn't say I don't know anything. I said I don't know the number of
> houses. The way interpolations work, everywhere except for OSM, is
> that you record the address of the first house on the block and the
> last house of the block (possibly on each side), and you assume that
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
> I can't think of a good solution for this, a few years ago they
> renumbered all properties along roads outside of residential areas to
> be the distance in decametres (10s of metres, 100m would be #10 etc)
> from the start of the road, they also have even o
2009/10/11 Liz :
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
>> I can't think of a good solution for this, a few years ago they
>> renumbered all properties along roads outside of residential areas to
>> be the distance in decametres (10s of metres, 100m would be #10 etc)
>> from the start of the road
26 matches
Mail list logo
