On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 19:15, Kevin Kenny wrote:
'Church'/'chapel' seem to be the unique example that everyone resorts
> to when identifying the former purpose of a building - because in so
> many places or denominations, the architecture is distinctive.
Yep. Although I'd argue that supermarke
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:47 AM Paul Allen wrote:
> Sometimes I use was: for that, more usually I put the info in a note.
> I tend to use was and disused on former chapels and churches that are
> of a style that are instantly recognizable as such.
I similarly leave it off a lot of buildings! I l
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:12, marc marc wrote:
in case of a was:SHOP=*, the previous shop (what's inside
> the building) has gone. and if you are consistent with yourself (you say
> that osm is not a database for memorizing history) when I survey it,
> the only thing I see is that the previous st
On 14/01/2020 19:02, Markus wrote:
> was:shop=supermarket
Le 16.01.20 à 12:34, Marc M. a écrit :
> I'm also using was: because I don't care and often don't known
> if a poi is destroyed, dismantled, demolished, moved, the only
> thing I can see is that it's gone.
Le 16.01.20 à 12:53, Dave F via T
