Re: [Tagging] about landcover/landcover=grass

sent from a phone > On 25. Apr 2017, at 07:06, muzirian wrote: > > Doesnt surface=grass work? yes, it "works", but isn't typically considered a feature but a property, I would still expect that some other tag says what it "is" cheers, Martin __

Re: [Tagging] about landcover/landcover=grass

>To me and probably to most, "grass" is not a kind of landuse, meadow would be, median strip would be (or more generally road related vegetation), but the tag has the advantage of leading to one of the desired results Doesnt surface=grass work? Regards

Re: [Tagging] about landcover/landcover=grass

sent from a phone > On 23. Apr 2017, at 12:25, muzirian wrote: > > I was wondering why landcover=grass has a page and directs people to use a > tag for whose key hasnt been well documented or approved. the thing is that voting is almost pointless (almost because it might impress less exper

Re: [Tagging] about landcover/landcover=grass

On 23-Apr-17 08:25 PM, muzirian wrote: I was going through the landuse=grass. And found this there "It is typical that landuse =*grass* is misused and should be changed to landcover =grass