Re: [Tagging] Tools and mass-retagging

I would not support "blind" mass retagging. There is too much specific use of landuse and natural which should remain as it is, until mappers judge differently because of what's on the ground. In my neighbourhood, a lot of landuse=forest is actual maintained and managed forest. No need to specify

Re: [Tagging] Tools and mass-retagging

On 08/06/18 23:51, Leo Gaspard wrote: On 06/08/2018 02:37 PM, Jeroen Hoek wrote: On 08-06-18 13:37, Leo Gaspard wrote:   * for all objects with natural=wood, add landcover=trees   * for all objects with landuse=forest, add landcover=trees The problem here is that I have use the tag landuse

Re: [Tagging] Tools and mass-retagging

On 06/08/2018 02:37 PM, Jeroen Hoek wrote: > On 08-06-18 13:37, Leo Gaspard wrote: >>   * for all objects with natural=wood, add landcover=trees >>   * for all objects with landuse=forest, add landcover=trees > > Why not consider documenting that natural=wood and landuse=forest imply > landcover=t

Re: [Tagging] Tools and mass-retagging

On 08-06-18 13:37, Leo Gaspard wrote: * for all objects with natural=wood, add landcover=trees * for all objects with landuse=forest, add landcover=trees Why not consider documenting that natural=wood and landuse=forest imply landcover=trees instead? It seems like a sensible default (simil

Re: [Tagging] Tools and mass-retagging

On 06/08/2018 10:29 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > (a) some people would be against any given mass retagging. > > So how to distinguish ones with broad support, sufficient to do that from > ones that should not be done? Well, basically tags are a kind of protocol, between the tagger and the rend

Re: [Tagging] Tools and mass-retagging (was: Re: The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag)

Hi 2018-06-08 10:29 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny : > > So how to distinguish ones with broad support, sufficient to do that from > ones that should not be done? > Exactly! It's a big issue since support of a tag is the main criteria to see it in renders or presets of many tools. > (b) any exist

Re: [Tagging] Tools and mass-retagging (was: Re: The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag)

8. Jun 2018 02:10 by osm...@leo.gaspard.io : > Then, I heard there were strong opinions in OSM against mass-retaggings. > I honestly don't get why. Main issues are that  (a) some people would be against any given mass retagging. So how to distinguish ones with