at 8:39 PM ET Commands wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 10:01:13 +0200
> > From: bkil
> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging buildings that people work in
> >
> [...]
>
&
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 10:01:13 +0200
From: bkil
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging buildings that people work in
[...]
Also, currently I see each of your replies as a new message thread,
unrelated to one another. Could you
On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 at 10:09, bkil wrote:
You've described the difference between specifying the high level landuse
> in an area (that may be even a few blocks large) compared to the proposed
> micro-mapping on buildings. This is correct, but I would like to know the
> reason, meaning what advanta
Sorry if I didn't make myself clear in formulating the questions, I'll try
to rephrase my inquiries again below.
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 8:09 PM ET Commands wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 20:34:52 +0200
> > From: bkil
> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging b
30, 2019 at 2:01 AM ET Commands wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 20:46:28 +0100
> > From: Paul Allen
> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging buildings that people work in
> >
> >
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 20:46:28 +0100
From: Paul Allen
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging buildings that people work in
On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 19:09, ET Commands wrote:
My personal criteria is not meant to be that exact. For
On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 19:09, ET Commands wrote:
My personal criteria is not meant to be that exact. For example, I can
> see from an aerial photo a large building surrounded by a large parking
> lot. I can surmise that several or many people work in the building,
> but I have no idea what they
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 12:47:37 +0100
From: Paul Allen
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging buildings that people work in
On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 10:51, bkil wrote:
By the way, don't get me wrong, it is a perfectly vali
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 20:34:52 +0200
From: bkil
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging buildings that people work in
I can see what maintenance burden this notation could bring, but I would
need more information to see what we could
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 20:24:54 -0400
From: Kevin Kenny
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging buildings that people work in
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:07 PM marc marc wrote:
following that, building=yes building:use=yes is better
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 17:05:14 +
From: marc marc
To: "tagging@openstreetmap.org"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging buildings that people work in
Le 23.05.19 à 18:57, ET Commands a écrit :
building=occupied
building=* is about what the building look like
a industrial-look build
On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 10:51, bkil wrote:
> By the way, don't get me wrong, it is a perfectly valid desire to tag
> these. $SUBJECT has occurred to me as well in the past. In such cases, I
> looked for the full address, other text on mailboxes, on the building , on
> the fence and in WLAN and PAN
By the way, don't get me wrong, it is a perfectly valid desire to tag
these. $SUBJECT has occurred to me as well in the past. In such cases, I
looked for the full address, other text on mailboxes, on the building
itself, on the fence and in WLAN and PAN in the air and tried to research
these on the
I can see what maintenance burden this notation could bring, but I would
need more information to see what we could gain from it.
landuse=* seemed appropriate for most use cases I have encountered. Why do
we need to tag this on a building resolution?
What data consumers did you have in mind?
Wha
sent from a phone
> On 23. May 2019, at 19:05, marc marc wrote:
>
> following that, building=yes building:use=yes is better
> yes can be improved when you'll known that's the current use,
> if it not the same as what is excepted for this building look
+1, seems to reflect the amount of knowl
24 May 2019, 02:24 by kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:07 PM marc marc wrote:
>
>> following that, building=yes building:use=yes is better
>> yes can be improved when you'll known that's the current use,
>> if it not the same as what is excepted for this building look
>>
>
On 24/05/19 10:24, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:07 PM marc marc wrote:
following that, building=yes building:use=yes is better
yes can be improved when you'll known that's the current use,
if it not the same as what is excepted for this building look
I'm even fine with 'buildin
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:07 PM marc marc wrote:
> following that, building=yes building:use=yes is better
> yes can be improved when you'll known that's the current use,
> if it not the same as what is excepted for this building look
I'm even fine with 'building=yes note=*'. A data consumer isn'
On 24/05/19 03:05, marc marc wrote:
Le 23.05.19 à 18:57, ET Commands a écrit :
building=occupied
Homes and apartments are also 'occupied'. So that is not what you are after.
Humm .. 'productive'???
building=* is about what the building look like
a industrial-look building with a residentia
Le 23.05.19 à 18:57, ET Commands a écrit :
> building=occupied
building=* is about what the building look like
a industrial-look building with a residential use, is still a
industrial-look and is mapped with :
building=industrial building:use=residential
following that, building=yes building:use
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:55 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > Area=yes is unnecessary.
>
> +1
>
>
But we have to explain why : area=yes is only useful when the main tag can
apply for a polygon (area) or a closed loop (ring). It has been created for
the tag highway which can be a place (e.g. hi
2010/4/26 Jukka Rahkonen :
> Area=yes is unnecessary.
+1
> And then the buildings have
> properties like architect, height, number of floors etc.
ideally yes. To find out which tags you can really find associated,
simply use tagwatch or analyse the planet ;-)
cheers,
Martin
__
Bill Ricker writes:
>
> > I think the answers will vary from different countries.
>
> And may vary locally. Within N miles of the sea-shore, the MASS-GIS
> import includes building outlines from the NOAA airborne LIDAR coastal
> survey. Tagging is quite spare :
>
> * area: yes
> * bui
> I think the answers will vary from different countries.
And may vary locally. Within N miles of the sea-shore, the MASS-GIS
import includes building outlines from the NOAA airborne LIDAR coastal
survey. Tagging is quite spare :
* area: yes
* building: yes
* source: MassGIS Building
2010/4/26 Alexander Sidorov :
> Hello!
>
> I am writing an application that queries OSM buildings. Please tell me what
> is the common way of tagging buildings. Do they usually have names (I'm
> talking about usual buildings, not places of interest)? What does usually
> name contain: addr:housenumb
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Alexander Sidorov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am writing an application that queries OSM buildings. Please tell me what
> is the common way of tagging buildings. Do they usually have names (I'm
> talking about usual buildings, not places of interest)? What does usually
> name contai
26 matches
Mail list logo
