On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 06:55 +0900, John Willis wrote:
>
> Something so "dangerous" in the US for children's playgrounds were removed a
> long time ago, but in Japan, they still have plenty of giant steel things to
> play on and, on three occasions, I have found ~ 10m zip line like rides. They
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 06:55 +0900, John Willis wrote:
>
> Something so "dangerous" in the US for children's playgrounds were removed a
> long time ago, but in Japan, they still have plenty of giant steel things to
> play on and, on three occasions, I have found ~ 10m zip line like rides. They
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 06:55 +0900, John Willis wrote:
>
> Something so "dangerous" in the US for children's playgrounds were removed a
> long time ago, but in Japan, they still have plenty of giant steel things to
> play on and, on three occasions, I have found ~ 10m zip line like rides. They
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 7:51 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Your words 'dangerous' immediately brought to mind ...
> There is an 'adult' playground in Manash, South Australia ... there have been
> a number of adult deaths there
> ..http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monash,_South_A
On 19/02/2015 8:55 AM, John Willis wrote:
Btw the playground-type zipwires which I see in nearby parks are around
50 meters, are the 10m types predominant in your place?
Richard
Something so "dangerous" in the US for children's playgrounds were removed a
long time ago, but in Japan, they sti
>
> Btw the playground-type zipwires which I see in nearby parks are around
> 50 meters, are the 10m types predominant in your place?
>
> Richard
Something so "dangerous" in the US for children's playgrounds were removed a
long time ago, but in Japan, they still have plenty of giant steel th
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:09:10PM +0900, John Willis wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:14 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Am 17.02.2015 um 21:52 schrieb Richard Z. :
> >>
> >> Deciding between the two would be always arbitrary
> >
> >
> > I'd not expect p
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:14 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> Am 17.02.2015 um 21:52 schrieb Richard Z. :
>>
>> Deciding between the two would be always arbitrary
>
>
> I'd not expect practical problems (inside a playground vs not), and
> distinguishing the two will help whe
> Am 17.02.2015 um 21:52 schrieb Richard Z. :
>
> Deciding between the two would be always arbitrary
I'd not expect practical problems (inside a playground vs not), and
distinguishing the two will help when rendering and you wanted different rules
according to context
cheers
Martin
___
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:19:35PM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> Richard Z. wrote on 2015-02-17 15:26:
> >>
> >>Otherwise you need to deprecate playground=zipwire.
> >
> >ok, I am in favor of deprecating playground=zipwire. Large share of aerialway
> >ziplines are part of "adult playgrounds". Technic
Richard Z. wrote on 2015-02-17 15:26:
Otherwise you need to deprecate playground=zipwire.
ok, I am in favor of deprecating playground=zipwire. Large share of aerialway
ziplines are part of "adult playgrounds". Technically there are no universally
valid principal differences that could differen
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:32:21PM +0100, fly wrote:
> Am 17.02.2015 um 12:59 schrieb Richard Z.:
> > Hi,
> >
> > RFC for aerialway=zip line is opened:
>
> This was a typo. True is aerialway=zip_line.
>
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feature/aerialway%3Dzip_line
>
> Would not
Am 17.02.2015 um 12:59 schrieb Richard Z.:
> Hi,
>
> RFC for aerialway=zip line is opened:
This was a typo. True is aerialway=zip_line.
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feature/aerialway%3Dzip_line
Would not include the zip_line on playgrounds as playground=zipwire
[1][2] is alrea
13 matches
Mail list logo
