Am 03.04.2011 11:52, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2011/4/3 Nathan Edgars II mailto:nerou...@gmail.com>>
There you can use incline=* to be explicit.
Yes, I know, but when I started mapping back in 2/2008 there was no
incline proposal, and later I found it sufficient to keep the implicit
2011/4/3 Nathan Edgars II
>
> There you can use incline=* to be explicit.
>
>
>
Yes, I know, but when I started mapping back in 2/2008 there was no incline
proposal, and later I found it sufficient to keep the implicit information.
Nobody used to draw plans would draw steps downwards. It is out o
On 4/3/2011 4:43 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/4/2 Erik Johansson mailto:erjo...@gmail.com>>
There are lots of tags that are direction dependant:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Way_Direction_Dependent
It does seem like josm handles many of those in a good way, not
2011/4/2 Erik Johansson
> There are lots of tags that are direction dependant:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Way_Direction_Dependent
>
> It does seem like josm handles many of those in a good way, not all by
> far though.
>
>
there is also highway=steps which I personally like to
On 4/2/2011 8:57 AM, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 4/1/2011 5:59 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/directional
Presumably JOSM would treat this like oneway, in that it will prompt when
reversing a w
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 4/1/2011 5:59 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/directional
>
> Presumably JOSM would treat this like oneway, in that it will prompt when
> reversing a way?
There are lots of tags that are
On 4/1/2011 5:59 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/directional
Presumably JOSM would treat this like oneway, in that it will prompt
when reversing a way?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
h
