W dniu 09.08.2018 o 08:40, Christoph Hormann pisze:
> No, as i have written and explained this is fundamentally wrong. But it
> is a nice summary of the base dogma of the "everything is a polygon"
> fraction in OSM.
To be honest, the world is 4D, not just 2D, but OSM is not well-suited
to reflec
On Thursday 09 August 2018, Daniel Koc4� wrote:
>
> I like real life detailed data, but even in theory it's clear for me
> that while people might want some points, they are just what I've
> said - generalizations. [...]
No, as i have written and explained this is fundamentally wrong. But it
is
W dniu 07.08.2018 o 15:24, Christoph Hormann pisze:
> I think you have not understood the difference between measurement
> tolerance and convergence here.
I'm not sure what do you mean by "convergence", but there's no
measurement tolerance problem, because without accepting area as a base
and wit
Wow, thanks Martin - amazing stuff
Thanks
Graeme
On 8 August 2018 at 23:11, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 8. Aug 2018, at 05:24, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The centre of a place is a little cultural, a little of frequent use and a
> little from signs.m
sent from a phone
> On 8. Aug 2018, at 05:24, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The centre of a place is a little cultural, a little of frequent use and a
> little from signs.m
I’ve written 2 diary entries about the centres of Rome and Berlin, maybe it is
of interest in this context:
> The centre of a place is a little cultural, a little of frequent use and a
> little from signs.
> In Europe I suspect it is the railway station ..lots of signs pointing there.
> In rural Australia I would go with the post office, though the pub is quite
> popular. :)
In Belgium I would assume
For cities there must be a point associated to the polygon to tell where
the center is (maybe 2 if the city is poly centric, like Budapest maybe ?)
djakk
Le mer. 8 août 2018 à 05:25, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On 08/08/18 12:52, Bill Ricker wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6
On 08/08/18 12:52, Bill Ricker wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick
mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 7 August 2018 at 21:56, Daniel Koć mailto:daniel@ko%C4%87.pl>> wrote:
For example nobody would say that a city is a point
I'm not disagre
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7 August 2018 at 21:56, Daniel Koć wrote:
>
>>
>> For example nobody would say that a city is a point
>
>
> I'm not disagreeing with you, but people do refer to them, & somehow even
> measure them, as points!
>
> I'm sure that
On 7 August 2018 at 21:56, Daniel Koć wrote:
>
> For example nobody would say that a city is a point
I'm not disagreeing with you, but people do refer to them, & somehow even
measure them, as points!
I'm sure that you have the same situation in your country but an e.g. is my
State capital, Bri
On Tuesday 07 August 2018, Daniel Koc4� wrote:
> > A word regarding tolerance of coordinates and the implication that
> > they should be or have to be within the tolerance of measuring
> > devices - i don't think this is or should be the case. The point
> > of verifiability in OSM is not a toleran
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Daniel Koć wrote:
>
> The problem of how much continents there is and how are they named, is
> just parallel - it's
>
equally valid problem for points and areas.
Just to add to the confusion, the attribution of a location to a continent
depends upon context, eve
12 matches
Mail list logo
