Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-17 Thread antony.king
I've used 'smell' on the proposal; I think more people will know that word! As an aside, there's a playground viewer app here: http://ant.homelinux.net/maps/index.html which shows (as blue icons) any playgrounds created with the new schema. It's experimental at the moment, working with a snapsho

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-15 Thread Bill Ricker
re sensory=? to smell? Perhaps the word you want is Olfactory ? -- Bill n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread antony.king
My view was that baby=yes was shorthand for minage=0, maxage=about 4 - more a recommendation of age appropriateness than a hard limit. Also it was intended for the equipment rather than the whole play area - though in the unlikely case of an entire play area being for babies there wouldn't be any r

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread John Smith
On 15 May 2010 04:37, Erik Johansson wrote: > Sure, I only want to use baby=yes to tag if there is toys for babies. > This is mostly used for swings so I'm not entirely sure it's needed. > :-) There could be an exclusive area for toddlers, another for children and so on, imho instead of saying ba

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread John Smith
On 15 May 2010 04:42, John Smith wrote: > On 15 May 2010 04:23, Phil! Gold wrote: >> Could that be unified with other access designations? 'baby=designated' >> or 'baby=official'? > > It might be confusing to tag something arbitary as baby, wouldn't it > be better to tag age appropriateness? and

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread John Smith
On 15 May 2010 04:23, Phil! Gold wrote: > Could that be unified with other access designations? 'baby=designated' > or 'baby=official'? It might be confusing to tag something arbitary as baby, wouldn't it be better to tag age appropriateness? and height appropriateness for that matter. For exam

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread Erik Johansson
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Phil! Gold wrote: > * Erik Johansson [2010-05-14 18:29 +0200]: >> If you tag highway=footway with bike=yes then you don't make it >> exclusively for bikes. So if you tag a playground with baby=yes >> shouldn't that just mean that there are some baby specific toys

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread Phil! Gold
* Erik Johansson [2010-05-14 18:29 +0200]: > If you tag highway=footway with bike=yes then you don't make it > exclusively for bikes. So if you tag a playground with baby=yes > shouldn't that just mean that there are some baby specific toys there, > and baby=no that there aren't any big structures

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread Erik Johansson
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:02 AM, antony.king wrote: > Hi all, > > We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for > the last couple of months, And you did a very good job, I've always wondered what to call those hanging roundabouts myself. _

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread Erik Johansson
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:02 AM, antony.king wrote: > Hi all, > > We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for > the last couple of months, and I hope that we've covered all the > ground that needs to be covered by now. Could those that care to vote, > cast your votes on