On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:30:38PM +, marc marc wrote:
> Le 09.06.19 à 01:12, Richard a écrit :
> > The water level drops a few inches and
> > suddenly the "pipe" is no longer water filled
>
> intermittent=yes/no
that says that sometimes there is no water at all. But not that sometimes
it is
Le 09.06.19 à 01:12, Richard a écrit :
> The water level drops a few inches and
> suddenly the "pipe" is no longer water filled
intermittent=yes/no
some industrial installations (I am thinking of an waterway between
retention basins at the Grande-Dixence Dam, part of which is natural)
have been
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:27:36PM -0400, Nita Rae Sanders wrote:
> Here is one possible example of what you seem to be describing … way 84255726
>
> Within Florida's Oleno State Part, the Santa Fe River vanishes into a
> sinkhole. It then reappears at River Rise Preserve State Park. the
> route,
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 08:59:08PM +, marc marc wrote:
> I don't understand the logic of changing the meaning of a tag recently
> validated by a proposal without prior consultation.
> a natural siphon was before your modification a waterway=pressurised,
> now no more.
>
> the fact that the ap
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:28 PM Nita Rae Sanders wrote:
> Here is one possible example of what you seem to be describing … way 84255726
>
> Within Florida's Oleno State Part, the Santa Fe River vanishes into a
> sinkhole. It then reappears at River Rise Preserve State Park. the
> route, as depicted
Here is one possible example of what you seem to be describing … way 84255726
Within Florida's Oleno State Part, the Santa Fe River vanishes into a
sinkhole. It then reappears at River Rise Preserve State Park. the
route, as depicted in the way (a mile +/-), is the presumed
subterranean path. The
Hi Joseph,
Le sam. 1 juin 2019 à 12:07, Joseph Eisenberg
a écrit :
> Are there currently any natural siphons tagged as waterway=pressurised in
> the database?
>
> How would a mapper know that a natural siphon exists?
>
As some mapper may be speleologists, like other mapper can be climber or
any
Are there currently any natural siphons tagged as waterway=pressurised in
the database?
How would a mapper know that a natural siphon exists?
Wouldnt they be tagged as waterway=river or =stream based on those
definitions?
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:56 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent fro
sent from a phone
> On 31. May 2019, at 22:59, marc marc wrote:
>
> I don't understand the logic of changing the meaning of a tag recently
> validated by a proposal without prior consultation.
> a natural siphon was before your modification a waterway=pressurised,
> now no more.
I admit I h
I don't understand the logic of changing the meaning of a tag recently
validated by a proposal without prior consultation.
a natural siphon was before your modification a waterway=pressurised,
now no more.
the fact that the approved proposal did not want to go into the details
of speologies is no
10 matches
Mail list logo
