Re: [Tagging] Mirror setting marks

2018-07-26 Thread Warin
It would be part of a highway - so can be a sub tag as Tom suggests. I don't know about the name .. there must be a better term. I'll try to think of one. On 27/07/18 07:04, Tom Pfeifer wrote: In order to shorten the tag, avoid the crowded amenity space, and be more descriptive what vehicles

Re: [Tagging] Mirror setting marks

2018-07-26 Thread Tom Pfeifer
In order to shorten the tag, avoid the crowded amenity space, and be more descriptive what vehicles they are for, what about 'hgv=mirror_adjustments' ? On 26.07.2018 22:04, Tijmen Stam wrote: On 26-07-18 15:51, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: I'm fine with your proposal, I just wondered if the name

Re: [Tagging] Mirror setting marks

2018-07-26 Thread Tijmen Stam
On 26-07-18 15:51, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: I'm fine with your proposal, I just wondered if the name is appropriate. Is access to these sites regulated / opening hours, etc., is it just a kind of "parking space" (where you might not be allowed to park), etc. An alternative could be mirror_adju

Re: [Tagging] Mirror setting marks

2018-07-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I'm fine with your proposal, I just wondered if the name is appropriate. Is access to these sites regulated / opening hours, etc., is it just a kind of "parking space" (where you might not be allowed to park), etc. An alternative could be mirror_adjustment_site but maybe this sounds too big? Cheer

Re: [Tagging] Mirror setting marks

2018-07-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2018-07-26 15:18 GMT+02:00 Tijmen Stam : > > c: if not, I propose amenity=mirror_adjustment_marks and will make a > proposal on the wiki is it only about the marks, or could it be seen as a feature (the Dutch word has "place" in it) and the marks are part of it? Cheers, Martin ___