Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskipped numbers

2009-10-12 Thread Tobias Knerr
Mike N.: > Tobias mentioned a possible tag interpolation:complete=yes to represent > fully accurate address interpolation, which sounds like a simple solution. > If it is necessary to tag estimated address interpolation differently, it > would be good to know before the Tiger address interpolat

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskipped numbers

2009-10-12 Thread Anthony
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Mike N. wrote: >   There are plans in the US to import Tiger address interpolation > information - which is intentionally obfuscated for privacy reasons by law. > Tobias mentioned a possible tag  interpolation:complete=yes to represent > fully accurate address inte

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskipped numbers

2009-10-10 Thread Randy Thomson
Tobias Knerr wrote: > Randy Thomson: > >> Consequently, in single family dwelling areas, with even/odd > >> numbering, the numbering sequences go 00, 04, 08, 12, etc. for even > >> (N/W), and and 01, 05, 08, 13, etc. for odd (S/E) house numbering. > > > > >> [...] I have a > >> suggested scheme o

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularlyskipped numbers

2009-10-10 Thread Randy Thomson
Tobias Knerr wrote: > Anthony writes: > > In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown. > > I don't agree with this statement. I'd assume that an > interpolation=even between numbers 8 and 42 means that EVERY even > number between 8 and 42 is represented by this way. (With the > exception