Richard Bullock wrote:
>
> Or even we could just use
>
> addr:interpolation=x
>
> to mean that only every x numbers are included between the first and
> last
>
> So 1,5,9,13 could be tagged addr:interpolation=4
>
> That seems like a reasonable suggestion and a simple extension of the
> exist
Anthony writes:
>>> What is one supposed to do if the number of houses is unknown? Do I
>>> need to propose an
>>> addr:interpolation_as_the_word_is_defined_[...]
>>> to handle that situation?
Yes, you are trying to express something that is different from what I'm
trying to tag, so we should use
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Randy Thomson wrote:
> Of course, there are many places, mostly in commercial land-use areas
> that meet your example of widely and irregularly spaced numbers. I
> wouldn't attempt to use interpolation in such a situatation, but would
> either tag a building outline or a buildi
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Randy Thomson wrote:
> My answer to your first question is a labor saving of anywhere from 2
> to 10-fold for the mapper. I'm talking about thousands of houses.
And what about the labor savings when I try to map a few hundred strip
malls with addresses like this (
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Randy Thomson wrote:
> Anthony wrote:
>> If you know where
>> all the individual houses are, why bother with an interpolation?
>
> My answer to your first question is a labor saving of anywhere from 2
> to 10-fold for the mapper. I'm talking about thousands of hous
Anthony wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Tobias Knerr
> wrote:
> > Anthony writes:
> >> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown.
> >
> > I don't agree with this statement. I'd assume that an
> > interpolation=even between numbers 8 and 42 means that EVERY even
> > number be
Anthony wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Tobias Knerr
> wrote:
> > My suggestion is to use a new interpolation value; something like
> > interpolation=step + step=4 (step=2 would produce the same result as
> > odd/even, depending on the house number it starts with; step=1 would
> > have
Granted the number of buildings can be unknown, but is the number of
valid addresses unknown? In my case, the second address is not valid,
and will never be valid, unless a house is torn down and a duplex is
built in its place, which might (or might not) require a zoning change.
--
Randy
__
