Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread Richard Bullock
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Richard Bullock wrote: >> I was replying to the assertion by Anthony that interpolation doesn't >> specify which house numbers are present between two numbered nodes - just >> that some unspecified number is present. > > I was wrong. I assumed the word "interpo

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread Anthony
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Richard Bullock wrote: > I was replying to the assertion by Anthony that interpolation doesn't > specify which house numbers are present between two numbered nodes - just > that some unspecified number is present. I was wrong. I assumed the word "interpolation" w

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread Anthony
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Richard Bullock wrote: > If you type in a house number on the same street that does exist, it > takes you to the interpolated position of that house. Why do you think that's an interpolated position? I see no evidence that it is. In fact, I see evidence that it'

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread Richard Bullock
> 2009/10/11 Richard Bullock : >>> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown. >> >> >> The wiki page for the Karlsruhe Schema on interpolation has said this >> since >> the day it was created; >> >> "For missing house-numbers (e.g. missing "12") two ways need to be drawn >> (e.g. "1-11"

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-11 Thread John Smith
2009/10/11 Richard Bullock : >> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown. > > > The wiki page for the Karlsruhe Schema on interpolation has said this since > the day it was created; > > "For missing house-numbers (e.g. missing "12") two ways need to be drawn > (e.g. "1-11" and "13-25").

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-10 Thread Anthony
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > Anthony writes: >> In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown. > > I don't agree with this statement. I'd assume that an interpolation=even > between numbers 8 and 42 means that EVERY even number between 8 and 42 > is represented by

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-10 Thread Tobias Knerr
Anthony writes: > In an interpolation, the number of houses is unknown. I don't agree with this statement. I'd assume that an interpolation=even between numbers 8 and 42 means that EVERY even number between 8 and 42 is represented by this way. (With the exception of numbers that are tagged on indi

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-10 Thread Anthony
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > My suggestion is to use a new interpolation value; something like > interpolation=step + step=4 (step=2 would produce the same result as > odd/even, depending on the house number it starts with; step=1 would > have the same effect as all). I'

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-10 Thread Anthony
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Randy Thomson wrote: > Randy Thomson wrote: >> Consequently, in single family dwelling areas, with even/odd >> numbering, the numbering sequences go 00, 04, 08, 12, etc. for even >> (N/W), and and 01, 05, 08, 13, etc. for odd (S/E) house numbering. >> >> I don't kn

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-10 Thread Tobias Knerr
Randy Thomson: >> Consequently, in single family dwelling areas, with even/odd >> numbering, the numbering sequences go 00, 04, 08, 12, etc. for even >> (N/W), and and 01, 05, 08, 13, etc. for odd (S/E) house numbering. >> >> [...] I have a >> suggested scheme of adding an interpolation subkey, >>

Re: [Tagging] Housenumber interpolation with regularly skipped numbers

2009-10-10 Thread Randy Thomson
Randy Thomson wrote: > I addressed this topic in the Karlsruhe discussion page, but didn't > get much constructive input. Maybe it's more of a US problem. Still I > thought I should bring it here, since tagging has been split off from > general Talk. > > In Fort Worth, TX, (pop. approaching a mil