andcover tag).
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] FW :Re: RFC: new key Landcover
>From :mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
Date :Thu Nov 18 16:00:04 America/Chicago 2010
2010/11/18 Ralf Kleineisel :
> Did I say anything about single grass blades? On a beach you can have
> square ki
2010/11/18 Ralf Kleineisel :
> Did I say anything about single grass blades? On a beach you can have
> square kilometers of different surfaces, sand, pebbles, grass which are
> well big enough to tag.
I thought about something like this when you wrote about grass in the sand:
http://s3.images.co
On 11/18/2010 09:01 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/11/18 Ralf Kleineisel :
>> On 11/18/2010 04:32 AM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
>>
>>> So, you would be using multiple surface tags on the same area?
>>
>> No, I'd tag the whole beach as landuse=beach, the sandy areas as
>> surface=sand and th
2010/11/18 Ralf Kleineisel :
> On 11/18/2010 04:32 AM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
>
>> So, you would be using multiple surface tags on the same area?
>
> No, I'd tag the whole beach as landuse=beach, the sandy areas as
> surface=sand and the grass parts as surface=grass.
really? You are tagging s
On 11/18/2010 04:32 AM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
> So, you would be using multiple surface tags on the same area?
No, I'd tag the whole beach as landuse=beach, the sandy areas as
surface=sand and the grass parts as surface=grass.
___
Tagging mailing
So, you would be using multiple surface tags on the same area? I thought that
the usual practice was to have only one surface=whatever tag on a given area.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] FW :Re: RFC: new key Landcover
>From :mailto:r...@kleineisel.de
Date :Wed Nov 17
On 11/16/2010 06:59 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
> If you wanted to describe both the soil and what is growing on the
> soil, would you use both a surface tag and also a landcover tag? For
> example, if you had a sand dune stabilized by beach grass, would you
> use surface=sand and landcover=be
On 17 November 2010 04:51, Richard Welty wrote:
> in general, surface is a poor match to the needs of geologists,
> as there is rather a bit more to geology than just the surface.
How will adding a secondary tag that duplicates surface=* fix this?
___
On 11/16/10 1:40 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/11/16:
If you wanted to describe both the soil and what is growing on the soil, would
you use both a surface tag and also a landcover tag? For example, if you had a
sand dune stabilized by beach grass, would you use surface=sand and
landco
2010/11/16 :
> If you wanted to describe both the soil and what is growing on the soil,
> would you use both a surface tag and also a landcover tag? For example, if
> you had a sand dune stabilized by beach grass, would you use surface=sand and
> landcover=beach_grass?
I think that this is a
10 matches
Mail list logo
