Hi again!
2012/12/21 Ronnie Soak :
> We don't force anybody to use a certain style. But we still say: If
> you don't use the style we use, your work will neither be rendered nor
> used by other consumers.
That's not fully correct (in this context): it will be rendered and it
will be used - but un
Hi Martin,
>
>> 2. I have problems with the tag because it is (to my knowledge) the
>> first 'meta-tag' to be actively used by consumers.
>> It doesn't describe a feature of the real world but how a feature is
>> described by our tagging.
>> I much rather would like to see this information embedde
HI Ronnie!
2012/12/21 Ronnie Soak :
> I surely get the intention of enabeling renderers of any kind to draw
> more precice representations of lanes on a way.
> But I have two comments for you:
>
> 1. I think it PARTLY IS about position. Your tag does two things:
> allowing the renderers to positio
Hi Martin,
I surely get the intention of enabeling renderers of any kind to draw
more precice representations of lanes on a way.
But I have two comments for you:
1. I think it PARTLY IS about position. Your tag does two things:
allowing the renderers to position the lanes correctly in reference t
2012/12/20 Pieren :
> I guess it's purely for rendering. Why not (like 'label'). But it's
> only useful if you render lanes which is something I've not seen so
> far (for nano mapping ?).
Think of a navigation system with lane assistance - it's just a
renderer with a very high zoom level. ;-)
>
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2012/12/20 Pieren :
> > The point about car navigation systems is
> > incorrect. It does not care about the highway way position (and no
> GPS
> > device is accurate enough to determine on which lane you are).
>
>
> I wouldn't be so sure about that, professional GPS
2012/12/20 Pieren :
> The point about car navigation systems is
> incorrect. It does not care about the highway way position (and no GPS
> device is accurate enough to determine on which lane you are).
I wouldn't be so sure about that, professional GPS devices are that
precise, and by combining s
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Henning Scholland wrote:
> For me this isn't a good alternative for "drawing" the highway as an area.
> This is simple to understand and very flexible. It's not useful to have more
> or less two ways of tagging. Maybe you could explain, why it is useful ?
The wik
Am 20.12.2012 17:42, schrieb Martin Vonwald:
You have one tag: placement. Its value tells you where the OSM-way is:
* no tag -> in the middle of the road
* transition -> not parallel to any lane
* middle_of -> in the middle of on lane
* right_of/left_of -> right or left of one lane.
Too complica
You have one tag: placement. Its value tells you where the OSM-way is:
* no tag -> in the middle of the road
* transition -> not parallel to any lane
* middle_of -> in the middle of on lane
* right_of/left_of -> right or left of one lane.
Too complicated?
2012/12/20 Frederik Ramm :
> Hi,
>
>
> On
Hi,
On 12/20/2012 04:43 PM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Although it is still a draft I would like to get some feedback on this
proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/placement
Who is your target group - who do you think would be understanding and
using this tagging scheme?
11 matches
Mail list logo