On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:49 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> +1. This should be tagged as type of route-relation, probably in the
> "tourist"-rubrique and with a "winery tour"-subtag.
+1
--
Bill
n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com
___
Tagging mai
2010/5/23 John Smith :
> On 23 May 2010 08:24, Liz wrote:
>> If so, then a relation would be a sensible suggestion
>> I think we have used relation for "Tourist Route" in Australia.
>
> Tourist routes aren't only used for winery tours, maybe there needs to
> be a note or some other tag to indicate
On 23 May 2010 08:24, Liz wrote:
> If so, then a relation would be a sensible suggestion
> I think we have used relation for "Tourist Route" in Australia.
Tourist routes aren't only used for winery tours, maybe there needs to
be a note or some other tag to indicate what the tourist route primary
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> Hi,
> I see that there is a feature suggestion for adding wine roads on the map.
>
> How should that be done? Is tourism=wine_road ok? Should roads be
> added into a new relation?
>
> I see only that Slovenians are talking about this, but still there
Hi,
I see that there is a feature suggestion for adding wine roads on the map.
How should that be done? Is tourism=wine_road ok? Should roads be
added into a new relation?
I see only that Slovenians are talking about this, but still there is
no suggestion on what tags to use:
http://wiki.openstre
