Re: [Tagging] traffic_signs: human readable values vs. ISO and law codes

2024-04-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Mo., 15. Apr. 2024 um 12:33 Uhr schrieb Greg Troxel : > > It seems really obvious that normalized osm words and CC:codepoint are > different things and belong in different keys. > they are both ways to refer to a traffic sign, you do not have to know they are "CC:codepoint" values, you can ju

Re: [Tagging] traffic_signs: human readable values vs. ISO and law codes

2024-04-15 Thread Greg Troxel
yo paseopor writes: > Well, let's start. As you know there are values in traffic sign key that > are human readable and others that are the ISO code of the country plus the > code inside the traffic law of every country (from South Africa to USA). It > is not a big problem...except they are using

Re: [Tagging] traffic_signs: human readable values vs. ISO and law codes

2024-04-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 15 Apr 2024, at 07:37, yo paseopor wrote: > > It is not a big problem...except they are using the same key. it is not a problem, as long as the values describe a traffic sign. It means parsing doesn’t become even slightly more laborious, as a datauser you have to parse

[Tagging] traffic_signs: human readable values vs. ISO and law codes

2024-04-14 Thread yo paseopor
Well, let's start. As you know there are values in traffic sign key that are human readable and others that are the ISO code of the country plus the code inside the traffic law of every country (from South Africa to USA). It is not a big problem...except they are using the same key. Probably human