On 2/27/14 2:56 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> Color-coding is likely used by the fire department to signify matters such as
> how much water-flow is available. I don't know how standardized these color
> codes are, however.
>
>
there are standards published by the AWWA (American Water
Works Asso
Color-coding is likely used by the fire department to signify matters such as
how much water-flow is available. I don't know how standardized these color
codes are, however.
On February 27, 2014 1:36:48 PM CST, Andreas Labres wrote:
>Richard,
>
>fire_hydrant:type should remain unchanged, as t
On 2/27/14 2:36 PM, Andreas Labres wrote:
> Richard,
>
> fire_hydrant:type should remain unchanged, as this is negotiated with local
> fire
> departments here in Austria (as well as Germany). At least this is true for
> pillar and underground, those are most common and most important.
i now am pro
Richard,
fire_hydrant:type should remain unchanged, as this is negotiated with local fire
departments here in Austria (as well as Germany). At least this is true for
pillar and underground, those are most common and most important.
Then there are fixed suction points, either from a pond or from t
On 2/27/14 4:50 AM, Philip Barnes wrote:
> I also disagree with standpipe, in UK usage a standpipe is an emergency
> source of water provided for residents if mains water if off for some reason.
>
>
i have done some more research and asked around, and this
is where i'm at:
standpipe is ambiguous.
On 2/27/14 4:37 AM, Georg Feddern wrote:
> Am 26.02.2014 13:23, schrieb Richard Welty:
>
>> then the issue is whether we want to modify fire_hydrant:type or
>> replace it with a different tag altogether, say fire_hydrant:delivery
>> if we keep type, should we replace pillar with plug or fire_plug o
I also disagree with standpipe, in UK usage a standpipe is an emergency source
of water provided for residents if mains water if off for some reason.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 27/02/2014 9:37 Georg Feddern wrote:
Am 26.02.2014 13:23, schrieb Richard Welty:
> i'm currently
Am 26.02.2014 13:23, schrieb Richard Welty:
i'm currently tinkering with what will be come a proposal to modify
current hydrant tagging.
my thinking is to add
fire_hydrant:water_source={main,pond,stream,standpipe}
and deprecate fire_hydrant:type=pond
no objections except 'standpipe' - see b
On 2/26/14 3:30 AM, Georg Feddern wrote:
> Am 25.02.2014 17:08, schrieb Richard Welty:
>> i'm wondering if anyone can speak to where the tagging
>> for fire_hydrant:type came from?
>
> AFAIK the Germans are guilty again - and I plea myself for not-guilty.
> ;-)
> (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
Am 25.02.2014 17:08, schrieb Richard Welty:
i'm wondering if anyone can speak to where the tagging
for fire_hydrant:type came from?
AFAIK the Germans are guilty again - and I plea myself for not-guilty. ;-)
(see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant
and their histor
I wonder if there might be some regional variation in the US: I've always
thought of them as fire hydrants rather than fire plugs.
Looks like fire plug might be an older term and technology maybe coming out of
England based on the introductory paragraph at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_hydr
i'm wondering if anyone can speak to where the tagging
for fire_hydrant:type came from?
i'm seeing two issues with it right now.
one is that it conflates two concepts that probably should be
separated, the physical delivery method, e.g.
fire_hydrant:type=pillar
and the water source
fire_hydran
12 matches
Mail list logo
