If it's physically seperate, sure. Otherwise just oneway:bicycle=no
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 8:20 AM, José G Moya Y. wrote:
> In Madrid, in Puerta del Sol, there is a two-way bicycle way that shares
> space with a one-way car street. I haven't checked how it is mapped, but I
> guess a parallel l
In Madrid, in Puerta del Sol, there is a two-way bicycle way that shares
space with a one-way car street. I haven't checked how it is mapped, but I
guess a parallel line for bicycles would work.
Regards,
José Moya
El 27/8/2017 14:01, "Adam Snape" escribió:
> An unknown value cannot be meaningfu
An unknown value cannot be meaningfully used by routers etc. You could add
a fixme tag so that a local mapper can clarify the signs on the ground. If
there is no mention of cycles on signage then it should be assumed that the
one-way restriction applies equally to cycles (unless the country's laws
Is there an accepted/good way to differ between /"it is a oneway for
everyone, including bicycles"/ and /"it is a oneway, but it is unknown
if it is also a oneway for bicycles"/.
From the OSM wiki:
you can use |oneway:bicycle=*| to identify roads where the |oneway|
rules for cyclists dif
