On 30 October 2010 02:56, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>> embankment=yes would work for the vast majority of cases, but there
>>> may be some that service vehicles can't drive on.
>>
>> Most levees I've seen in Australia don't have a track running along
>> the top, the one at Goondiwindi has a footway
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:59 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On 29 October 2010 08:24, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> Is there a standard way to tag a levee? It seems that highway=track
>> embankment=yes would work for the vast majority of cases, but there
>> may be some that service vehicles can't drive on.
On 10/28/2010 05:24 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Is there a standard way to tag a levee? It seems that highway=track
> embankment=yes would work for the vast majority of cases, but there
> may be some that service vehicles can't drive on.
Most levees don't have tracks or anything on top because t
2010/10/29 Nathan Edgars II :
> Should this be
> separately tagged with such a name,
yes
> or is it assumed that a canal next
> to a levee shares a name (like a sidewalk next to a road)?
don't assume anything
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing li
On 29 October 2010 08:24, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Is there a standard way to tag a levee? It seems that highway=track
> embankment=yes would work for the vast majority of cases, but there
> may be some that service vehicles can't drive on.
Most levees I've seen in Australia don't have a track r
Is there a standard way to tag a levee? It seems that highway=track
embankment=yes would work for the vast majority of cases, but there
may be some that service vehicles can't drive on.
Also, levees (at least in swampland) often have an associated adjacent
canal without its own name. This is somet
