Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-03 Thread Thilo Haug OSM
Such as in the bicycle shop example ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbicycle#Additional_keys This one has been discussed : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/service:bicycle And it's totally different to the car version : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-03 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2018-09-03 15:18 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug OSM : > The principle should be described in general (not only for rental and > not only for one shop), > as there's currently a mess with different formats (compare car / > bicycle / motorcycle shops). speaking about "mess"; it is the result of people cre

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-03 Thread Warin
On 03/09/18 23:18, Thilo Haug OSM wrote: The principle should be described in general (not only for rental and not only for one shop), as there's currently a mess with different formats (compare car / bicycle / motorcycle shops). +1 ___ Tagging ma

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-03 Thread Thilo Haug OSM
Hi, "Doesn't need a semicolon, only the main activity gets amenity=*, see examples" is fine. The principle should be described in general (not only for rental and not only for one shop), as there's currently a mess with different formats (compare car / bicycle / motorcycle shops). I think namesp

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-03 Thread Hufkratzer
On 2.9.2018 22:06 Thilo Haug OSM wrote: {...] The current namespace article doesn't mention underscores : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Namespace#Example_namespace_uses I think it doesn't have to, the underscore can just be a part of a key or a value like any letter [a-z] can. The ame

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 2. Sep 2018, at 22:06, Thilo Haug OSM wrote: > > Hi, > > I don't have a general preference about the format, Would you mind moving all your proposals into the proposal section of the wiki? You should also refrain from linking to them from the tag definition pages as

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-02 Thread Thilo Haug OSM
Hi, I don't have a general preference about the format, but I think it should be possible to express several things to rent (buy/repair etc.) and it should be easily be possible to filter for all these items (regardless whether it's a shop/hotel/farm). So the format should be flexible enough to a

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-02 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 23:38, Hufkratzer wrote: > I am sorry that my English is so bad. Your English is fine! > I wrote that I think the best way would be > a) amenity=horse_rental or horse_rental=yes (if secondary activity) > and wrote I don't like > c) horse:rental=yes > I'm sorry, my faul

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-02 Thread Hufkratzer
It looks like you didn't understand me. I am sorry that my English is so bad. I am trying to express my question in a different way: We have some differnet ways to tag a bicycle rental: a) amenity=bicycle_rental (30k uses), bicycle_rental=yes (< 20 uses) b) rental=bicycle (< 300 uses) (rental:bi

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-01 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 00:26, Hufkratzer wrote: > One can rent a horse for trail riding, guided or unguided, or for riding > inside of an enclosed area, with or without a teacher. One can do this for > just an hour or for several days and also with horse.drawn caravans, see > these example webpag

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-01 Thread Hufkratzer
As far as horses are concerned, in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-August/038781.html I wrote: "If the horse rental is only a secondary activity it may be tagged horse_rental=yes (with underline, currently used once) instead of horse:rental=yes (with colon), analogously to

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-01 Thread Thilo Haug OSM
And what if a touristic item (farm, hotel, shop...) offers several things to rent ? Let's say horses, bicycles, jetski ? Am 01.09.2018 um 16:25 schrieb Hufkratzer: > On 1.9.2018 02:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: >> >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 at 09:03, Hufkratzer > > wrote: >

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-09-01 Thread Hufkratzer
On 1.9.2018 02:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 at 09:03, Hufkratzer > wrote: I think a better alternative would be to use amenity=horse_rental, this is currently used 5 times, this would be analogous to amenity=car_rental, amenity=b

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-08-31 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 at 09:03, Hufkratzer wrote: > I think a better alternative would be to use amenity=horse_rental, this > is currently used 5 times, this would be analogous to > amenity=car_rental, amenity=bicycle_rental and amenity=boat_rental. > I'm not sure if horse rental would really be an

Re: [Tagging] horse rental

2018-08-31 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 1. Sep 2018, at 01:02, Hufkratzer wrote: > > I think these numbers do not justify an explanation on a main wiki page, the > new tags may be proposed on a proposal page. Yesterday I’ve found a similar problem created by the same user: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/

[Tagging] horse rental

2018-08-31 Thread Hufkratzer
3 months ago on the wiki page for tag leisure=horse_riding someone recommended to use the tags horse:rental=yes and horse:type=* to indicate that one can rent a horse there. At the time of this addition these tags were not used, meanwhile horse:rental=yes is used once and horse:type twice, I