Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

> > On Apr 17, 2019, at 7:32 PM, Peter Elderson wrote: > > I reacted to the comparison with a bridge. > I guess there will be no consensus. > > Vr gr Peter Elderson it follows the current footway=crossing + crossing=* tagging scheme, so instead of: highway=footway footway=crossing crossin

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

I reacted to the comparison with a bridge. I guess there will be no consensus. Vr gr Peter Elderson Op wo 17 apr. 2019 om 12:19 schreef Mateusz Konieczny < matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > > > > Apr 17, 2019, 11:21 AM by pelder...@gmail.com: > > So where a cycleway crosses a road with a dedicated cr

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

Apr 17, 2019, 11:21 AM by pelder...@gmail.com: > So where a cycleway crosses a road with a dedicated crossing:  > > * the crossing section has nodes on each side indicating where the crossing > physically begins and ends; > * the crossing section is tagged highway=cycleway, crossing=yes > > Co

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

So where a cycleway crosses a road with a dedicated crossing: * the crossing section has nodes on each side indicating where the crossing physically begins and ends; * the crossing section is tagged highway=cycleway, crossing=yes Correct? Vr gr Peter Elderson Op wo 17 apr. 2019 om 05:50 schree

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

> highway=path This is all a result on an incomplete tagging set, and using highway=path as a catch-all tag to avoid creation and documentation of missing tags. Any and all of the footway=* values and sub-tags should also be available for cycleway=* path=* and bridleway=* as well. Also, the

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

I am heavily mapping cycling-related objects in Italy. I have only occasionally listened into this discussion due to lack of time. Let me just comment on a few things: The problem number one is that cycling-related traffic rules are much more variegated. Creating a uniform approasch for all countr

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

Apr 16, 2019, 3:47 PM by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > Le 16.04.19 à 15:25, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > >> Apr 16, 2019, 2:50 PM by >> marc_marc_...@hotmail.com >> >> : >> >> > highway=path/highway=footway that has bicycle=yes/bicycle=designated. >> >> high

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

Hi, it feels a bit wrong to me to use cycleway=crossing on a highway=footway or highway=path, as described on the wiki page . I might have been doing it wrong all the time but I always use hw=footway + footway=crossing hw=cycleway + cyc

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

Le 16.04.19 à 15:25, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > Apr 16, 2019, 2:50 PM by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > > > highway=path/highway=footway that has bicycle=yes/bicycle=designated. > > highway=path + path=crossing + bicycle=yes|designate > or highway=footway + footway=crossing + bicycl

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

Apr 16, 2019, 2:50 PM by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > > highway=path/highway=footway that has bicycle=yes/bicycle=designated. > > highway=path + path=crossing + bicycle=yes|designate > or highway=footway + footway=crossing + bicycle=yes|designate > is not enought ? > It is enough, I rephrased it

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

Le 16.04.19 à 12:35, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > I turned > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:cycleway%3Dcrossing > from redirect into a separate page. great. > cycleway=crossing is additional tag <...> with highway=cycleway ok > highway=path/highway=footway that has bicy

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

Apr 16, 2019, 8:21 AM by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > there are ~12,000 uses of cycleway=crossing  on ways according to taginfo, > but no documentation for the tag.  > To reduce confusion in the future I turned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:cycleway%3Dcrossing

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

Apr 16, 2019, 12:22 PM by p...@trigpoint.me.uk: > > > On Tuesday, 16 April 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> >> Apr 16, 2019, 8:21 AM by >> tagging@openstreetmap.org >> >> : >> >> >> highway=cycleway cycleway=crossing >> >> >> > >> > I have been mapping more

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

On Tuesday, 16 April 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > Apr 16, 2019, 8:21 AM by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > > >> highway=cycleway cycleway=crossing > >> > > > > I have been mapping more and more cycleways here in Japan, and there is a > > true need for cycleway=crossing. > > > > Unlike some

Re: [Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

Apr 16, 2019, 8:21 AM by tagging@openstreetmap.org: >> highway=cycleway cycleway=crossing >> > > I have been mapping more and more cycleways here in Japan, and there is a > true need for cycleway=crossing.  > > Unlike some other countries where the cycleway is more akin to a road, > cycleways h

[Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

> highway=cycleway cycleway=crossing I have been mapping more and more cycleways here in Japan, and there is a true need for cycleway=crossing. Unlike some other countries where the cycleway is more akin to a road, cycleways here in Japan are often treated like footpaths, and dead-end into s