The most common physical signage in the USA gives just a number range:
It would be nice to have a clutter free way to tag those, in part because
they could be collected
in bulk by drive cameras and OCR.
It's less information than an interpolation line, but still very very
useful. Many printed
Am 23.04.2015 um 06:34 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:13 PM, John F. Eldredge
> wrote:
>
>> Would you need to split the road into two ways, one for the left side and
>> one for the right side, even if the roadway is not actually divided? This
>> would cause a mismatch between
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:13 PM, John F. Eldredge
wrote:
> Would you need to split the road into two ways, one for the left side and
> one for the right side, even if the roadway is not actually divided? This
> would cause a mismatch between the rendering and what is physically present.
>
I woul
Would you need to split the road into two ways, one for the left side and one
for the right side, even if the roadway is not actually divided? This would
cause a mismatch between the rendering and what is physically present.
On April 21, 2015 3:33:13 PM CDT, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> I think it is not the best idea, other people may need to split road -
> and as result multiple ways will have "addr:housenumber=100-500".
>
> Yes, that's an issue.
So is doubling the way sharing nodes.
And also creating a parallel way c
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:25:00 -0700
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> JOSM's validator presently complains if any "addr" tags are on a
> "highway". The code
> note says the author wanted to catch highway=residential /
> addr:postcode type tagging.
>
> But it also complains on this tagging:
>
>highway=
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9811
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:40 AM, fly wrote:
> Are there addresses on both side of the street ?
>
In this case, the arrangement is unknown.
Each campground loop road is marked only with a range (e.g. pitches
numbered 51-103).
While I could tag the sign ("Sites 51-103"), tagging the way gives mor
I think this type of information has value. Even if every building on the
street also has its own address, this allows an application to find the
approximate location of an address for a building that at the time of the
survey had not been built. The necessary information can often be found on
st
Are there addresses on both side of the street ?
Think it is wrong tagging as addr:interpolation=* should be on separate
way(s) on one or both side(s) of the street and the first plus the last
node get the addr:housenumber=*.
cu fly
Am 21.04.2015 um 19:25 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt:
> JOSM's validat
JOSM's validator presently complains if any "addr" tags are on a
"highway". The code
note says the author wanted to catch highway=residential / addr:postcode
type tagging.
But it also complains on this tagging:
highway=residential
addr:interpolation=all
addr:housenumber=100-500
Which
11 matches
Mail list logo
