Apr 14, 2019, 12:37 AM by pelder...@gmail.com:
> But I would say, practically, guideposts do not need to be in the route
> relation. If a guidepost is part of a route, it is also part of a way so the
> point location is already in there.
>
AFAIK most (many?) guideposts are not tagged this wat, b
sent from a phone
> On 13. Apr 2019, at 23:45, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some of these are simply small signs with symbols only, nailed to a farmers
> fence post or tree and may be easy to miss unless you are looking for them.
There is also the
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.o
On 13/04/2019 23:37, Peter Elderson wrote:
... If a guidepost is part of a route, it is also part of a way so the
point location is already in there.
In my experience that's generally not the case - guideposts and route
markers are usually added in there actual location (off to one side of
On 14/04/19 08:37, Peter Elderson wrote:
Loose guidepost nodes are a nuisance when processing route relations
by hand or by software. On the other hand, you might argue that most
routes are nothing else than imaginary lines between guideposts.
But I would say, practically, guideposts do not ne
Loose guidepost nodes are a nuisance when processing route relations by
hand or by software. On the other hand, you might argue that most routes
are nothing else than imaginary lines between guideposts.
But I would say, practically, guideposts do not need to be in the route
relation. If a guidepos
At least some guide posts are to guide people along a particular route,
particularly where a few paths meet, where the route diverges off the main
path/road, or where there has been a long distance since the last guide post.
Some of these are simply small signs with symbols only, nailed to a fa
Hi,
I'd argue that in most cases it is wrong to add the guidepost
at all to the route, with ot without role. They are not part of
the route they just happen to be along the side of it.
We don't add direction signs on motorways to a motorway relation
either just because the motorway happens to be
I would like to see clearer on that one, as we have just launched the
collaboration between OSM and the Italian Alpine Club (CAI). And that
collaboration will insert a large number of guideposts.
Anyone able to check how many information=guidepost without role=guidepost
there are in route relations
sent from a phone
> On 13. Apr 2019, at 12:06, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> But your example is different. You put the function into the name field. For
> me the role of an object tagged information=guidepost is exactly that, a
> guidepost. I am sure I am missing something, otherwise it would
ssion, strategy and related tools
Datum: 13. 4. 2019 12:11:19
Předmět: Re: [Tagging] What is the role of "role=guidepost"
"
But your example is different. You put the function into the name field. For
me the role of an object tagged information=guidepost is exactly that, a
guidep
But your example is different. You put the function into the name field.
For me the role of an object tagged information=guidepost is exactly that,
a guidepost. I am sure I am missing something, otherwise it would not have
50k uses.
I admit to being Overpass-ignorant. Can someone help me find exam
On 13/04/2019 09:52, Volker Schmidt wrote:
I have only now detected this (optional?) role value in route relations.
What's the purpose of this?
Or put in other words: I have a node tagged with
"information=guidepost". What is the difference between inserting it
in a route relation with or witho
I have only now detected this (optional?) role value in route relations.
What's the purpose of this?
Or put in other words: I have a node tagged with "information=guidepost".
What is the difference between inserting it in a route relation with or
without "role=guidepost"
I must be missing something
13 matches
Mail list logo
