2015-05-25 17:11 GMT+02:00 Richard :
> [water=cascade] still weasel enough. Could be a single waterfall, a series
> of them or this:
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldau-Kaskade
>
fountain_type=cascade should make the object clear
if you'd want to be more specific:
start_date=1500-1600 --> h
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:46:18PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > So "cascade" would be a true weasel tag.
>
>
> yes, it is typical for words to have different meanings in different
> contexts, but water=cascade will be much less a weasel than the word cascade
> alone
still enough of
> Am 25.05.2015 um 13:37 schrieb Richard :
>
>
> in some languages a cascade is any series of "things", be it
> electronic switches in circuits or waterfalls - even in English
> as I have just noticed from reading wiktionary:
>
> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cascade
>
> So "cascade" would
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:53:48PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis :
> >
> > I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
>
>
> I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...
in some languages a cascade
> On May 25, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>> Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis :
>>
>> I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
>
>
> I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...
The water careened off the cliff.
Th
On 24 May 2015 at 22:53, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis :
> >
> > I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
>
>
> I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...
>
>
Only where the water hits other things
> Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis :
>
> I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well...
>
> Also - saying a waterfall is a reflecting pool is very disingenuous - it's
> not "that" it reflects -
I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together.
Wether that is natural or artificial, I'm not sure there's a distinction.
http://www.tripadvisor.com/MobileViewPhoto-g298182-d1311890-i131738347-Ryuzu_Waterfall-Nikko_Tochigi_Prefecture_Kanto.html
I've visited a lot of wa
On 23 May 2015 at 11:09, Richard Z. wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> > On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> > > I am uncomfortable with "cascade" - in several languages it
> > > means "waterfall" so there is considerable potential for
> > > con
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 03:54:57PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> > I am uncomfortable with "cascade" - in several languages it
> > means "waterfall" so there is considerable potential for
> > confusion.
> >
> > I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in Am
How about fountain_cascade or waterfall_artificial?
It's a tricky proposition.
On Friday, May 22, 2015, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 22 May 2015 at 15:54, Andy Mabbett > wrote:
>
> > How, then would you describe:
>
> Or these:
>
>
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Site_of_Priory_Mill_-_geo
On 22 May 2015 at 15:54, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> How, then would you describe:
Or these:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Site_of_Priory_Mill_-_geograph.org.uk_-_288573.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luxury_apartments,_Dickens_Heath_Village,_Solihull_-_geograph.org.uk
On 22 May 2015 at 15:29, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> I am uncomfortable with "cascade" - in several languages it
> means "waterfall" so there is considerable potential for
> confusion.
>
> I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.
How, then would you describe:
https://commons.wikim
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:26:34AM -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> The water feature we are talking about here is an artificial waterfall,
> usually pump-driven.
in that case it might be better to either use normal waterfall tagging
node with waterway=waterfall+ way waterway=weir,
possibl
I am uncomfortable with "cascade" - in several languages it
means "waterfall" so there is considerable potential for
confusion.
I agree. A cascade is a waterfall in American English.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Richard Z. wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoef
The water feature we are talking about here is an artificial waterfall,
usually pump-driven.
On May 22, 2015 9:19:44 AM "Richard Z." wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett :
> >
> > These might be c
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett :
> >
> > These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
> >
> > We might, for example, have:
> >
> > natural=water
> > water=cascde
>
> Am 22.05.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Andy Mabbett :
>
> These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
>
> We might, for example, have:
>
> natural=water
> water=cascde
>
> etc. - but not:
>
> water=fountain
>
> as we already have
>
> amenity=fountain
>
>
On 22 May 2015 at 12:03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> what are the other examples? We cannot propose tags if you don't say what you
> want to tag ;-)
"man-made, ornamental water features, which are not fountains"
These might be cascades, rills, reflecting-pools, rain-chains, moats, etc.
We mi
> Am 22.05.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Andy Mabbett :
>
> Cascades, by their very nature, are not suitable for reflecting as the
> water is agitated.
maybe this is a language issue, I would have thought they would reflect anyway
but you wouldn't see a clear picture (I agree that reflection_pool i
On 15 May 2015 at 16:40, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> Wiki suggests natural=water + water=reflecting_pool:
Cascades, by their very nature, are not suitable for reflecting as the
water is agitated. There may also be no horizontal surface to speak
of.
> Maybe water=cascade could be the right fit.
Prob
On 15 May 2015 at 12:25, pmailkeey . wrote:
> 'Pond' seems to fit the bill:
No, it does not.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/taggi
pet, 15. svi 2015. 13:15 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> je napisao:
On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> A lot of those end up as natural=water. I suppose man_made=yes could
> be added.
>
The 'Pool of Reflection' Sydney is simply tagged
natural=water
name=Pool of Reflection
Way: 182625
'Pond' seems to fit the bill: OED: "A small body of still water of
artificial formation, made either by excavating a hollow in the ground or
by embanking and damming up a watercourse in a natural hollow."
On 15 May 2015 at 12:13, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce
On 15/05/2015 4:55 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
A lot of those end up as natural=water. I suppose man_made=yes could
be added.
The 'Pool of Reflection' Sydney is simply tagged
natural=water
name=Pool of Reflection
Way: 182625202
That is an ornamental memorial pool. Flat.
I've added a just cas
2015-05-15 8:48 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett :
> How should we tag man=made, ornamental water features, which are not
> fountains? For example, a cascade?
>
fountains also require a natural=water for the effective water areas. See
here: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/705
A lot of those end up as natural=water. I suppose man_made=yes could be
added.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
How should we tag man=made, ornamental water features, which are not
fountains? For example, a cascade?
The wiki pages at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Water
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfountain
are of little help in this regard.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
28 matches
Mail list logo
