On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 23:30, marc marc wrote:
>
> man_made=tank + usage=clarifier or usage=digester
+1
Regards
Markus
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Le 28. 10. 18 à 02:06, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit :
>> (I know that there is man_made=storage_tank
it's a 2-in-1 tag :
man_made=tank + usage=storage
because if the same tank is used for wastewater,
it 'll look the same, only the usage change.
and using man_made=storage_tank for a not-a-storage
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 08:14, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> landuse for tagging features is not a good fit, I prefer man_made for these,
> as it fits better with the general scheme of tags
I agree. This is why i proposed man_made=basin|tank in a later message.
Regards
Markus
_
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 02:07, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> I would actually call them tanks rather than basins
Doesn't a tank need to be closed?
> When you look at storage_tanks
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank, there are
> actually sub-tags for
> content=sewa
sent from a phone
> On 27. Oct 2018, at 09:27, SelfishSeahorse wrote:
>
> Another idea i see is to extend the current tagging scheme with
> landuse=basin (+ content=sewage) by creating new basin=* values
> basin=clarifier and basin=digester.
landuse for tagging features is not a good fit, I
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 01:53, SelfishSeahorse
wrote:
> I think it's okay to call them basins, isn't it?
>
I would actually call them tanks rather than basins
> (I know that there is man_made=storage_tank, but these tanks are for
> treating waste
> water, not for storing them.)
When you look
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 08:20:03 -0700
Clifford Snow wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 6:05 AM Paul Allen wrote:
>
> >
> > It has the disadvantage that it doesn't make sense. At least not
> > to me, as a native speaker of
> > British English (which is the normal language for defining OSM
> > tags)
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 15:06, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> It has the disadvantage that it doesn't make sense. At least not to me, as a
> native speaker of
> British English (which is the normal language for defining OSM tags) and as
> somebody who
> doesn't work in sanitation. Maybe a British sanita
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:46 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> Would you also change the main man_made=wastewater_plant listing?
>
> Maybe wastewater=plant / facility?
>
> If we man_made=wastewater_plant didn't exist, then I would propose a new
key of wastewater=* similar to the power=*. At this
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 6:05 AM Paul Allen wrote:
>
> It has the disadvantage that it doesn't make sense. At least not to me,
> as a native speaker of
> British English (which is the normal language for defining OSM tags) and
> as somebody who
> doesn't work in sanitation. Maybe a British sanit
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:28 AM SelfishSeahorse
wrote:
>
> Another idea i see is to extend the current tagging scheme with
> landuse=basin (+ content=sewage) by creating new basin=* values
> basin=clarifier and basin=digester. This would have the advantage that
> no retagging is required and peop
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 19:23, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
> For tagging, I'd to suggest the two tags.
> man_made=clarifier (used 28 times)
> man_made=digester (anaerobic used 3 times, including one misspelling)
Another idea i see is to extend the current tagging scheme with
landuse=basin (+ content=se
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 09:17, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 2:36 PM François Lacombe <
> fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> That's a good idea, other components of wastewater treatement plants
>> should be mapped the same way
>> Nevertheless, man_made isn't appropr
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 2:36 PM François Lacombe
wrote:
> Hi
>
> That's a good idea, other components of wastewater treatement plants
> should be mapped the same way
> Nevertheless, man_made isn't appropriate for that.
>
> wastewater=* or at least water=* should be used for such values, shouldn't
Hi
That's a good idea, other components of wastewater treatement plants should
be mapped the same way
Nevertheless, man_made isn't appropriate for that.
wastewater=* or at least water=* should be used for such values, shouldn't
you?
All the best
François
Le ven. 26 oct. 2018 à 19:23, Clifford
I'd like to expand tagging of wastewater treatment plants by adding in
clarifiers and digesters to the man_made=wastewater_plant wiki page.
This came about as I was editing an area with a wastewater treatment
facility. I didn't know what the various parts of the facility were
called. A friend who
16 matches
Mail list logo
