Hi,
Am 19.02.20 um 12:45 schrieb Jez Nicholson:
> In general, are these signs physically on the camera, or are they in the
> vicinity? If so, should they be tagged objects in their own account?
In supermarkets and other shops, I do not map surveillance cameras
individually. Instead, I just put su
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 19 feb 2020, alle ore 04:31, Victor/tuxayo ha
> scritto:
>
> > In countries where the public must be notified of surveillance cameras, the
> > following tags could be used on the node:
> >
> > tourism=information
> > information=board
> > board_type=
I think a warning sign is legally required in Nederland. I don't think it's
very useful to register the absence or presence of mandatory warning signs
in OSM. If it is not there, report it to whoever is supposed to maintain or
enforce it. If you want to register incidents to make a stand, an
ushahi
On the ones I've noticed in Cambridge, they are either on the lower part of
the pole supporting the camera, or, for building-mounted cameras, on the
wall below the camera. (The cameras are well above head height, and
notices on them would not be readable unless very large.)
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 a
In general, are these signs physically on the camera, or are they in the
vicinity? If so, should they be tagged objects in their own account?
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020, 10:54 John Sturdy, wrote:
> Whatever the concensus in another discussion was, I think that double
> negatives will risk confusion, an
Whatever the concensus in another discussion was, I think that double
negatives will risk confusion, and that *:signed=yes and *:signed=no seems
to be a reasonable proposal.
I have noticed that some but not all of the surveillance cameras (city
council, I believe) in Cambridge (UK) have signs.
__
Le 19.02.20 à 04:29, Victor/tuxayo a écrit :
> Coincidentally there was a recent discussion[2] about these signs in the
> french mailing list (talk-fr) which lead to adding the following section
> in the page
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=surveillance
I warn that this addition
Hi, :)
This is kind of a proposal/first discussion to introduce the following
tag and values for surveillance cameras :
"camera:signed=yes" => when the camera has a sign that warns about it's
presence.
"camera:signed=no" => when the camera does not hold any information sign
about itself.
==
