Am 21.06.2013 22:11, schrieb Tod Fitch:
>
> I think that it would make sense to allow some of those tags to be
> used on the way that bounds the entire campground.
> For example camp_site:water=yes/no may be the same for all
> sites/pitches within a campground and tagging it in one place, if >
app
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
> For example *camp_site:water=yes/no* may be the same for all
> sites/pitches within a campground and tagging it in one place, if
> appropriate, assures consistency. (The campground I was looking at when I
> started this discussion has piping to
If I may summarize things to this point, two general proposals have been made:
1. Extend the normal street addressing to include lots, sites or pitches
2. Add a whole new set of tags specific to campsites.
My camping experience has been mostly in the western United States and my views
are affec
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> IMHO this is somehow different (you won't have named streets inside an
> apartment building, like you might have on a camp ground).
>
The apartment proposals on the Wiki try to separate out those routes (which
may be hallways) based o
On 20/giu/2013, at 17:03, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Err, not quite. Pretty much any large apartment community has named streets,
> with addresses on those streets, albeit with red signs (permissive streets)
> or black signs (restricted-access streets).
fine, I was writing about the building.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> IMHO this is somehow different (you won't have named streets inside an
> apartment building, like you might have on a camp ground). Anyway, for
> apartments there is addr:door, addr:flats, addr:unit, addr:suite and maybe
> more (gettin
2013/6/20 Erik Johansson
> I think this discussion seems a lot like the one on "apartment
> numbers" we had a while back. I couldn't find it though.
>
>
IMHO this is somehow different (you won't have named streets inside an
apartment building, like you might have on a camp ground). Anyway, for
I think this discussion seems a lot like the one on "apartment
numbers" we had a while back. I couldn't find it though.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:17 PM, fly wrote:
> On 18.06.2013 05:27, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> I'm thinking it might be time to revive this proposal:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.o
On 18.06.2013 05:27, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I'm thinking it might be time to revive this proposal:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site
Interesting proposal
> In which, the space my 5th Wheel has been for the last half a year would
> be part of a site relation.
With bit coin?
—
Elliott Plack
Sent from Mailbox on iPhone 5
about.me/elliottp
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> Is it reasonable to expect the routing people to extend to lot numbers
>> (e.g. find me lot 252 of Camp
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Is it reasonable to expect the routing people to extend to lot numbers
> (e.g. find me lot 252 of Camp Mingo at 801 Mingo Road)?
>
Ever order a pizza in any but the tiniest apartment complexes, campgrounds
or RV sites? This problem is comm
Am 18.06.2013 18:13, schrieb Bryce Nesbitt:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote:
>
>> What about
>> addr:housenumber=801
>> addr:street=North Mingo Road
>> addr:lot=252
>>
>
> Under current rendering, won't that create lots of little 801's all
> scattered on the map?
Ye
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> What about
> addr:housenumber=801
> addr:street=North Mingo Road
> addr:lot=252
>
Under current rendering, won't that create lots of little 801's all
scattered on the map?
Is it reasonable to expect the routing people to extend to lot
On 18/giu/2013, at 05:27, Paul Johnson wrote:
> addr:housenumber=801
> addr:street=North Mingo Road
> ...
> lot:number=252
what about
addr:housenumber=801
addr:street=North Mingo Road
addr:lot=252
?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Taggi
I'm thinking it might be time to revive this proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site
In which, the space my 5th Wheel has been for the last half a year would be
part of a site relation. The node or closed way representing my spot would
be tagged...
addr:ho
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> How about use of "addr:street" for the most specific subdivision
> available, usually the campground name:
>
> addr:housenumber=*53*
> addr:street=*Upper Pines Campground*
> addr:place=*Yosemite National Park*
> addr:district=*Mariposa Count
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
> In the case I am looking at now there is no street number for the
> campground. At least there is no sign indicating one nor have I seen a
> street number on an any map. So I guess that addr:housenumber might work.
> But I imagine that there are
Instead of duplicating the campground name:
addr:street=CampgroundName
addr:city=CampgroundName
addr:housenumber=SiteNumber
How about use of "addr:street" for the most specific subdivision available,
usually the campground name:
addr:housenumber=*53*
addr:street=*Upper Pines Campground*
addr:pl
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:19:48 Tod Fitch wrote:
> In the case I am looking at now there is no street number for the
> campground. At least there is no sign indicating one nor have I seen a
> street number on an any map. So I guess that addr:housenumber might work.
> But I imagine that there are campg
I haven't mapped it yet at a space level detail. I can't really say I like
the idea of using house number as the space number for some campgrounds but
not others, that's just a bad hack. I remember some space number proposal
in the wiki, but it wasn't clear how it was supposed to work.
On Jun 17
In the case I am looking at now there is no street number for the campground.
At least there is no sign indicating one nor have I seen a street number on an
any map. So I guess that addr:housenumber might work. But I imagine that there
are campgrounds that actually have an street number assigned
As someone who lives in a campground, that's a hack. My address is similar
to how most American apartment complexes or office buildings handle
addresses (house number, street, unit number).
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> A campsite number seems a direct analog to a hou
A campsite number seems a direct analog to a house number. "Site 52,
Evergreen Campground" is a form of address that in olden days a mailman
might actually have delivered to. I don't see this as a rendering hack...
it seems pretty clean to me.
But do place the node where the little number post i
I started a discussion on this on the talk-us list but the best suggestion I've
had, received off list, was to ask here on the tagging list.
My original thread is at
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-June/011066.html
Long story: While updating things in the Mt. Pinos area I
24 matches
Mail list logo