On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 08:10:17PM -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The new rendering of forests broke cases where a lake is inside a forest
> and the lake is not mapped as an inner section of the surrounding forest
> polygon.
it also "broke" the case of parking lots.
> But after some di
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:45:23AM +0200, Daniel Koć wrote:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest
>
> The whole issue is not as straightforward as one can reasonably expect.
definitely.
> According to Wikipedia:
>
> "A forest is a large area of land covered with trees or other woody
>
For me, forestry is the production of wood, using trees. So a 'forestry
area' would include mature trees, young trees, saplings, fresh plantings
and places where the trees have been removed.
I think that is what is meant by landuse = forest
On the other hand there are areas that are covered in
W dniu 17.08.2015 4:10, Martijn van Exel napisał(a):
But after some discussion I realized that this may be a side effect of
a different problem, namely how we tag national forests. In the US,
these seem to be tagged as landuse=forest which is only partly true:
within a National Forest, many diff
Hi,
The new rendering of forests broke cases where a lake is inside a forest
and the lake is not mapped as an inner section of the surrounding forest
polygon.
I posted this issue in the carto issue tracker:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1754
But after some discussio
