2011/8/23 Colin Smale :
> My point is that all these tags
> which are *now* established and widely in use, probably got that way without
> discussion and documentation *in advance* but were simply taken into use by
> the early contributors and documented afterwards.
+1, I also guess that in the e
On 22/08/2011 18:50, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/8/17 Colin Smale:
On 17/08/2011 12:19, Sander Deryckere wrote:
It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at least
how I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process.
So I would just delete it and point the write
2011/8/17 Colin Smale :
> On 17/08/2011 12:19, Sander Deryckere wrote:
>> It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at least
>> how I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process.
>>
>> So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process.
>>
> Since wh
> point the writer to the voting process.
I agree that it would be nice to stick closer to the proposal
procedure when defining new tags in the wiki.
Recently there is lots of pages popping up which try to establish
alternative tagging schemes to already in use schemes (I guess that
sometimes th
It's probably worth trying to include the original author of the page in
any discussion.
There's no wiki user page or talk page, but my guess is that it's this guy:
http://bryankaraffa.com/contact/
Cheers,
Andy
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@opens
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> The whole basis of OSM is "openness" - you can
> use whatever tags you like. Discussion and voting is really required only if
> you expect other consumers of the data to do something with your data
I don't want to enter in such discussion. We
On 17/08/2011 12:19, Sander Deryckere wrote:
It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at
least how I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process.
So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process.
Since when is the voting process mandatory?
It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at least how
I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process.
So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process.
Op 17 aug. 2011 11:39 schreef "Pieren" het volgende:
> Someone added last night a unique contr
Someone added last night a unique contribution in the wiki about a new tag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_accident%3Dtrue
If we believe taginfo stats, this key has not been used until now. The
wiki page is also orphan.
Is it a good idea to keep such tag in the wiki ? Should we de
