On 4/18/2012 9:34 AM, Masi Master wrote:
For me, it looks like a bicycle-lane. On first look with no sign, so i
would tag it cycleway=lane + bicycle=yes (<- no designated or official,
because a OSM-cycleway is for me a way, that is "made for cycling" (with
no implied access), access can be added
For me, it looks like a bicycle-lane. On first look with no sign, so i
would tag it cycleway=lane + bicycle=yes (<- no designated or official,
because a OSM-cycleway is for me a way, that is "made for cycling" (with
no implied access), access can be added with bicycle=*).
But on second look
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> One regional mapper uses cycleway=shoulder for this, but I see that as
> sub-optimal, since it's primarily a shoulder, not a cycleway. It would be
> like putting cycleway=sidewalk whenever there's a smooth paved sidewalk.
I quite like "c
I'm wondering what the best way would be to tag a good-quality shoulder
that acts essentially as an undesignated bike lane, in that you can use
it but it is not required. Current Florida DOT policy is to use these on
rural roads, with marked bike lanes only when there is a lane to the
right. Fo
