rsday, January 13, 2011 6:37 PM
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging]RFC: historic:civilization and historic:period Re:new
key civilization
writes:
In holland we have a saying: Better to turn back halfway then get lost
at the end.
Means that if you look at the more and more po
writes:
> In holland we have a saying: Better to turn back halfway then get lost
> at the end.
>
> Means that if you look at the more and more popular way of tagging. It
> is wiser to you this on this occassion and correct the alt fashion
> tags. Last year the :right and :left subtag is a
In holland we have a saying: Better to turn back halfway then get lost
at the end.
Means that if you look at the more and more popular way of tagging. It
is wiser to you this on this occassion and correct the alt fashion
tags. Last year the :right and :left subtag is a big use to a lot of
2011/1/13 :
>
> Why: fortification_type=hill_fort
>
> Better is: fortification:type=hill_fort
where do you get this idea from? There are 289 fortification_type and
0 fortification:type in the db.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openst
Why: fortification_type=hill_fort
Better is: fortification:type=hill_fort
-Robert-
Citeren Johan Jönsson :
Ulf Lamping writes:
In practice, lot's of sites have *several* different "roots" throughout
the ages.
A castle may be build in early medieval ages, continuously extended
throughout
2011/1/13 Ulf Lamping :
> Could you explain both?
The hill would be tagged according to what is there (maybe
archaeological_site ?)
The castle would be tagged as building=castle (and castle subtypes
etc., it's in the wiki). As you wrote it is an almost complete
rebuild, still I'd tag it probably
Am 13.01.2011 03:08, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2011/1/12 Ulf Lamping:
In practice, lot's of sites have *several* different "roots" throughout the
ages.
A castle may be build in early medieval ages, continuously extended
throughout those ages, largely changed in the baroque era and mostly re
2011/1/12 Ulf Lamping :
> In practice, lot's of sites have *several* different "roots" throughout the
> ages.
>
> A castle may be build in early medieval ages, continuously extended
> throughout those ages, largely changed in the baroque era and mostly rebuild
> after damages of the second world w
Ulf Lamping writes:
>
> In practice, lot's of sites have *several* different "roots" throughout
> the ages.
>
> A castle may be build in early medieval ages, continuously extended
> throughout those ages, largely changed in the baroque era and mostly
> rebuild after damages of the second worl
Am 12.01.2011 17:59, schrieb j...@jfeldredge.com:
Your examples are rather ridiculous. A Viking captain, or King Arthur's sword,
would not be logical items to have on a map.
Hmmm, I guess Pieren is very much aware of this :-)
A building or archaeological site likely would be on a map, and t
maps.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] RFC: historic:civilization and historic:period Re:new
key civilization
From :mailto:pier...@gmail.com
Date :Wed Jan 12 10:23:21 America/Chicago 2011
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:40 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wro
11 matches
Mail list logo
