Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread fly
Am 09.07.2014 23:49, schrieb Janko Mihelić: > Should there be a relation with type=way? For when you need a way that > is not an area over an existing way. Example would be a fence that is > put on a wall. There is already a proposal for type=multilinestring [1]. I use it occasionally to map barr

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-07-10 12:52 GMT+02:00 Peter Wendorff : > And: Why restrict to > nodes? why not use a way relation as well for ways sharing the same spot > (e.g. tram and highway, communication cables and water tubes, ...) > yes, there is also room for a way-relation, completely agree. Don't need it current

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi Martin, at a first glance I thought you're joking with this proposal. Editor software often fuses nodes on the same coordinate, that's right unfortunately, but it's not a problem of nodes being on the same spot, but a bug in the editors. The handling of relations in most cases is even more comp

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 10/lug/2014 um 10:09 schrieb Pieren : > > I don't see any problem to have over two elements on the same > position if they have different "ele" or "layer" values. I think from a practical point of view these situations are problematic, both for creation and selection of these nodes. Edit

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread Pieren
I think here you just try to compensate the missing 'z' component in OSM. I don't see any problem to have over two elements on the same position if they have different "ele" or "layer" values. Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org ht

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 09/lug/2014 um 23:49 schrieb Janko Mihelić : > > Should there be a relation with type=way? For when you need a way that is not > an area over an existing way. Example would be a fence that is put on a wall. I think yes ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-09 Thread Janko Mihelić
Should there be a relation with type=way? For when you need a way that is not an area over an existing way. Example would be a fence that is put on a wall. Janko Dana 9. 7. 2014. 19:47 osoba "Martin Koppenhoefer" napisala je: > I have proposed the node relation, a concept that I was missing for

[Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I have proposed the node relation, a concept that I was missing for some time now. Have a look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Node cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetma