Re: [Tagging] RFC: Directional Flow

2011-04-03 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 03.04.2011 11:52, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: 2011/4/3 Nathan Edgars II mailto:nerou...@gmail.com>> There you can use incline=* to be explicit. Yes, I know, but when I started mapping back in 2/2008 there was no incline proposal, and later I found it sufficient to keep the implicit

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Directional Flow

2011-04-03 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/4/3 Nathan Edgars II > > There you can use incline=* to be explicit. > > > Yes, I know, but when I started mapping back in 2/2008 there was no incline proposal, and later I found it sufficient to keep the implicit information. Nobody used to draw plans would draw steps downwards. It is out o

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Directional Flow

2011-04-03 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 4/3/2011 4:43 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/4/2 Erik Johansson mailto:erjo...@gmail.com>> There are lots of tags that are direction dependant: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Way_Direction_Dependent It does seem like josm handles many of those in a good way, not

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Directional Flow

2011-04-03 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/4/2 Erik Johansson > There are lots of tags that are direction dependant: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Way_Direction_Dependent > > It does seem like josm handles many of those in a good way, not all by > far though. > > there is also highway=steps which I personally like to

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Directional Flow

2011-04-02 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 4/2/2011 8:57 AM, Erik Johansson wrote: On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: On 4/1/2011 5:59 PM, Paul Norman wrote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/directional Presumably JOSM would treat this like oneway, in that it will prompt when reversing a w

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Directional Flow

2011-04-02 Thread Erik Johansson
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 4/1/2011 5:59 PM, Paul Norman wrote: >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/directional > > Presumably JOSM would treat this like oneway, in that it will prompt when > reversing a way? There are lots of tags that are

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Directional Flow

2011-04-02 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 4/1/2011 5:59 PM, Paul Norman wrote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/directional Presumably JOSM would treat this like oneway, in that it will prompt when reversing a way? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org h

[Tagging] RFC: Directional Flow

2011-04-01 Thread Paul Norman
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/directional Some things to note - This does not redefine the existing convention of waterways flowing in the direction of the way. - directional=-1 is included for completeness, I do not expect it to be used frequently. - Unknown values shoul