See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoking
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoking
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
> I object. The feature page should document actual usage, and actual usage
> differs from proposed usage. smoking=outside is the second most common
> value
> and 15x more abundant than the proposed smoking:outside=yes.
If you look, I
Am 23.03.2015 um 08:35 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann:
> On 21.03.2015 01:54, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> Any objection to moving:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Smoking
>> because it is heavily used and obviously well established.
You are right my "+1" was to fast.
> I object. T
2015-03-22 14:00 GMT+01:00 fly :
> +1 but please copy and archive the proposal
+1, rather than "(User moved page Proposed features/Smoking to Tag:smoking)
(undo)" the Tag definition page should be a new page, referring the
proposal page (e.g. in the "see also" section, or maybe a dedicated
"pro
On 21.03.2015 01:54, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Any objection to moving:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Smoking
> because it is heavily used and obviously well established.
I object. The feature page should document actual usage, and actual usage
differs from proposed usage. sm
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:00 AM, fly wrote:
> +1 but please copy and archive the proposal
I'm pretty sure I screwed up the archive process,
despite the template {{Archived proposal}}. Sorry.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://l
Moved http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:smoking
Left for now http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsmoking_area
There is some divergence between the translations.
Tag:amenity%3Dsmoking_area appeared in a unilateral edit on 14 May
2014 by user ArPi with comment "create microwiki":
h
Am 21.03.2015 um 18:43 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>> Am 21.03.2015 um 08:54 schrieb Michael Reichert :
>>
>> I agree. Because it is used on 47541 objects at OSM all over the world,
>> it's best to move the page to Key:smoking.
>
> +1
+1 but please copy and archive the proposal
fly
__
Heh. Few things that look easy really are. I'll additionally propose
to fold:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dsmoking_area&action=history
Into smoking=yes
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.ope
I propose adding a small note to specifically cover "designated smoking
areas" on closed ways:
smoking=designated
area=yes
As the remaining smokers must find and congregate in those :-).
And removing the section on default relations, as it's not actually used
(and as noted problematic):
/
> Am 21.03.2015 um 08:54 schrieb Michael Reichert :
>
>
> I agree. Because it is used on 47541 objects at OSM all over the world,
> it's best to move the page to Key:smoking.
+1
cheers
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
h
Hi,
Am 2015-03-21 um 02:29 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt:
> Additions to that page, I'd think, should be proposed separately.
>
> -
> The utility undergrounding RFC proposes tagging for a similar "regional
> default value".
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Quickly_Marking_Utility_Wi
Hi Bryce,
Am 2015-03-21 um 01:54 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt:
> Any objection to moving:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Smoking
> because it is heavily used and obviously well established.
I agree. Because it is used on 47541 objects at OSM all over the world,
it's best to move
Additions to that page, I'd think, should be proposed separately.
-
The utility undergrounding RFC proposes tagging for a similar "regional
default value".
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Quickly_Marking_Utility_Wires
Eventually the tools will catch up :-)
But that case is si
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Shawn K. Quinn
wrote:
> I don't object, but it would be nice if there was a way to say a city or
> county was non-smoking in certain types of establishments by default, in
> addition to tagging each one as smoking=no.
>
I agree. Since OSM is a geographical databa
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 17:54 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Any objection to moving:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Smoking
> because it is heavily used and obviously well established.
I don't object, but it would be nice if there was a way to say a city or
county was non-smo
Any objection to moving:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Smoking
because it is heavily used and obviously well established.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
17 matches
Mail list logo
