Re: [Tagging] On appointment restaurant

2015-05-16 Thread Robin `ypid` Schneider
On 16.05.2015 02:03, André Pirard wrote: > On 2015-05-15 10:09, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote : >> On 14.05.2015 23:17, André Pirard wrote: >>> On 2015-05-13 16:49, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote : Hi This can already be done, no problem. It is even described on the key page [1].

Re: [Tagging] On appointment restaurant

2015-05-15 Thread André Pirard
On 2015-05-15 10:09, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote : > On 14.05.2015 23:17, André Pirard wrote: >> On 2015-05-13 16:49, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote : >>> Hi >>> >>> This can already be done, no problem. It is even described on the key page >>> [1]. >>> Just search for "on appointment". >> Typical

Re: [Tagging] On appointment restaurant

2015-05-15 Thread Robin `ypid` Schneider
On 14.05.2015 23:17, André Pirard wrote: > On 2015-05-13 16:49, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote : >> Hi >> >> This can already be done, no problem. It is even described on the key page >> [1]. >> Just search for "on appointment". > Typical of that page, you discover "on appointment" by chance in an >

Re: [Tagging] On appointment restaurant

2015-05-14 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Thu, 14 May 2015 17:14:52 -0700 Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > If it's unclear on the wiki, and not simple enough that people get it > right 80% of the time, it won't ever be machine processed. Tags with 20% of wrong values would be probably anyway ignored as useless. ___

Re: [Tagging] On appointment restaurant

2015-05-14 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:17 PM, André Pirard wrote: > > And you make me discover a very fundamental rule I didn't notice after 36 > readings: that the tokens can be literal strings. And I wonder how software > supposed to tell whether it's open can understand strings. > Software can't. The dirt

Re: [Tagging] On appointment restaurant

2015-05-14 Thread André Pirard
On 2015-05-13 16:38, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote : > I would tag that as amenity=events_venue. Yes, it's almost that ("almost" 'cause it doesn't have a separate entrance from the restaurant, it is the restaurant). Really much better than to make believe it's a normal restaurant. I have added a See A

Re: [Tagging] On appointment restaurant

2015-05-13 Thread Robin `ypid` Schneider
Hi This can already be done, no problem. It is even described on the key page [1]. Just search for "on appointment". Garbage detector software: * http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/?setLng=en * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_Assurance_Tools_script Checkout: http://openingh.openstreet

Re: [Tagging] On appointment restaurant

2015-05-13 Thread phil
I would tag that as amenity=events_venue. Phil (trigpoint ) On Wed May 13 15:26:45 2015 GMT+0100, André Pirard wrote: > Hi, > > Either opening_hours=on_appointment is missing or amenity=restaurant > lacks a tag or an explanation. > > It is a restaurant indeed, but only hired for private group e

[Tagging] On appointment restaurant

2015-05-13 Thread André Pirard
Hi, Either opening_hours=on_appointment is missing or amenity=restaurant lacks a tag or an explanation. It is a restaurant indeed, but only hired for private group events like marriages. It is not an amenity=community_centre but it's also what you call a craft=caterer. How do I map that? BTW,