On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Michael Tsang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I tagged the public_transport=stop_position's on the light rail network
> in my
> region with railway=tram_stop, because the wiki mentions that "Insert a
> node
> with railway=tram_stop and name=* on the tram track (railway=tr
Dear all,
I tagged the public_transport=stop_position's on the light rail network in my
region with railway=tram_stop, because the wiki mentions that "Insert a node
with railway=tram_stop and name=* on the tram track (railway=tram) at the
position where the stop is located." However, the light
Hey Andrew,
Your question would have been better asked at talk-tran...@osm.org
(mailing-list for public transport)
On 31/05/12 09:39, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> 2012/5/31 Andrew Errington :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This light-rail station is above ground near an airport in South Korea.
>>
>> http://osm.org/
2012/5/31 Andrew Errington :
> I originally mapped the light rail (two tracks) and added a node at
> each station point (so, two nodes per station, one in each direction).
generally it is better to have only _one_ station where there is only
one station. Currently there are discussions on talk-de
2012/5/31 Andrew Errington :
> Hi all,
>
> This light-rail station is above ground near an airport in South Korea.
>
> http://osm.org/go/546KGWeqC--?m
>
> I originally mapped the light rail (two tracks) and added a node at
> each station point (so, two nodes per station, one in each direction).
>
>
Hi all,
This light-rail station is above ground near an airport in South Korea.
http://osm.org/go/546KGWeqC--?m
I originally mapped the light rail (two tracks) and added a node at
each station point (so, two nodes per station, one in each direction).
A new mapper has done a nice job of the airp
The many hybrid systems (operating as tramways with shared right of way and
street level stops in inner cities and with dedicated infrastructure and
exclusive right of way - I mentioned some examples in another response)
don't make the situation any clearer. I am inclined to not expand the
tagging
On 8/18/2011 1:49 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Where I come from[1], light rail is characterized by longer stop
intervals and right of way and dedicated infrastructure as a rule,
compared to tram. If that's not the same for the US, then it may not be
a good idea to have dedicated tagging for it.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Richard Mann <
richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's various systems that use railway=tram_stop. You tag what you
> like, but there's no guarantee anyone will pick up your data if you
> use something different. I don't know if that matters.
>
You mea
Where I come from[1], light rail is characterized by longer stop intervals
and right of way and dedicated infrastructure as a rule, compared to tram.
If that's not the same for the US, then it may not be a good idea to have
dedicated tagging for it.
Martijn
[1] That's generally a sensible reserva
On 8/18/2011 11:18 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
John,
Trams and light rail are two disparate things, in planning and
construction, service, and embedding into the existing infrastructure.
No they're not. Put light rail vehicles on what had been a tram line and
suddenly it becomes light rail (e
There's various systems that use railway=tram_stop. You tag what you
like, but there's no guarantee anyone will pick up your data if you
use something different. I don't know if that matters.
Some tram/light_rail systems run exclusively on-street, others use a
bit of track, some are mostly on trac
Steve,
I think you may have something there. I also believe there is room for a
separate definition for something between a streetside tram halt and a
full-fledged train station as part of a traditional heavy rail system.
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Thu,
John,
Trams and light rail are two disparate things, in planning and construction,
service, and embedding into the existing infrastructure. Do you mean they
are the same in OpenStreetMap? I think they should not be.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:05 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 18 August 2011
Richard,
Why 'should' they be a tram stop? Is that a convention I don't know about? I
can't derive it from the descriptions in the wiki.
The local situation here in Salt Lake is actually a little more complicated.
TRAX is definitely a light rail system (With Siemens SD-100 and Avanto sets)
but fo
Trams and street-running light rail should have railway=tram_stop. Put
in a sub-tag if you want to distinguish different types.
If your light-rail system runs onto heavy rail (eg famously in
Karlsruhe), and shares stations with heavy rail passenger services,
then use railway=station on the clearly
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> A light rail stop, would that be a railway=tram_stop or a railway=station?
Sounds like a third option is required. Here (Melbourne, Australia)
tram stops vary from just a sign on a telephone pole to "super stops"
(raised platforms, safety
On 18 August 2011 14:59, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi all,
> A light rail stop, would that be a railway=tram_stop or a railway=station?
Light rail is nearly always, if not always, trams...
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists
Hi all,
A light rail stop, would that be a railway=tram_stop or a railway=station?
I'm mapping the recently opened UTA TRAX extensions [1] and tagged the stops
of the West Valley extension as railway=station, but now I see that existing
stops are railway=tram_stop.
I think a tram stop suggests som
19 matches
Mail list logo
