Cartinus wrote:
> > Can we still have discussion about that and have it approved - even if it
> > is a bit late ?-)
>
> If it is in use by a significant number of mappers then it is approved, no
> matter what the wiki says.
Yes, but it would be fine for others that the significant number of
map
This one's right here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Intermittent_river
There were some discussions on it the past few days in context of
Pakistan mapping.
The usage is different from those tidal edges though.
Am 26.08.2010 23:03, schrieb Samat K Jain:
On Thursday, Au
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 02:29:01 pm, Bégin, Daniel wrote:
> Since last year I have been working with the Canadian Osm community to have
> the entire Canadian 50K map content (Canvec product) available in .osm format.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec
>
> The product is now avail
On Thursday 26 August 2010 22:29:01 Bégin, Daniel wrote:
> Can we still have discussion about that and have it approved - even if it
> is a bit late ?-)
If it is in use by a significant number of mappers then it is approved, no
matter what the wiki says.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
___
Hi folks,
Since last year I have been working with the Canadian Osm community to have the
entire Canadian 50K map content (Canvec product) available in .osm format.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec
The product is now available and is being uploaded in osm database by the
Canadian comm
