Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – Time domains

2012-11-04 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi Tobias, Am Sonntag, 4. November 2012, 22:25:56 schrieb Tobias Knerr: > Does your new page take into account existing work on the topic? For > example, there is a relevant and quite thorough specification with > associated code hosted here: > > http://www.netzwolf.info/en/cartography/osm/time_d

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – Time domains

2012-11-04 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi Martin, Am Sonntag, 4. November 2012, 22:15:22 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > there is this example, which is quite obvious on the page: Mo-Fr > 08:00-16:00; We 08:00-20:00 > > But how are things if this is Mo-Fr 08:00-12:00; We 14:00-18:00 ? > Will it be open on a Wednesday at 11:00? the op

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – Time domains

2012-11-04 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 04.11.2012 19:05, Eckhart Wörner wrote: > The result can be seen in > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Time_domains Does your new page take into account existing work on the topic? For example, there is a relevant and quite thorough specification with associated code hosted

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – Time domains

2012-11-04 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi Peter, Am Sonntag, 4. November 2012, 22:08:38 schrieb Peter Wendorff: > > However, I want to write examples based on a specification, not the other > > way round, therefore the specification has to come first. > As the tagging advice is already there, I partly disagree here. Please > don't ch

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – Time domains

2012-11-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
there is this example, which is quite obvious on the page: Mo-Fr 08:00-16:00; We 08:00-20:00 But how are things if this is Mo-Fr 08:00-12:00; We 14:00-18:00 ? Will it be open on a Wednesday at 11:00? Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@ope

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – Time domains

2012-11-04 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 04.11.2012 21:56, schrieb Eckhart Wörner: Hi Peter, Am Sonntag, 4. November 2012, 21:03:12 schrieb Peter Wendorff: With a rough scan only - so no details about the content of your wiki page: Yes, I think it's useful to have this kind of documentation, but IMHO it's not a good replacement, bu

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – Time domains

2012-11-04 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi Peter, Am Sonntag, 4. November 2012, 21:03:12 schrieb Peter Wendorff: > With a rough scan only - so no details about the content of your wiki page: > Yes, I think it's useful to have this kind of documentation, but IMHO > it's not a good replacement, but an addition to the example based one.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – Time domains

2012-11-04 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi Eckhart. With a rough scan only - so no details about the content of your wiki page: Yes, I think it's useful to have this kind of documentation, but IMHO it's not a good replacement, but an addition to the example based one. To understand a technical documentation like that you have to under

[Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – Time domains

2012-11-04 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi everybody, as you probably know, all condition-related proposals and specifically the accepted Conditional Restrictions depend on the opening_hours syntax for time domains. However, the whole page is a huge mess. It tries to define the syntax using examples (which is doomed to fail). In cons