To add to that, Thailand has many tourist facilities named "resort" but we
would call them hotels. They are not for camping.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:11 AM, David Bannon
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 07:12 +, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
> > > OK Phil, I was not aware of that difference. So
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 07:12 +, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
> > OK Phil, I was not aware of that difference. So that leaves us wonder
> > what to call those UK Holiday Camps ? Leave it to the UK people I
> > guess.
> >
> There are not many left, they were of their time. In the UK context
> t
On Wed May 6 23:21:41 2015 GMT+0100, David Bannon wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 11:09 +, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
> >
> > A resort is usually a town whos primary purpose is tourism. A resort
> > is not operated by a single company, and access is not restricted.
> > Resort should
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 7, 2015, at 7:21 AM, David Bannon wrote:
>
>
>> On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 11:09 +, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
>>
>> A resort is usually a town whos primary purpose is tourism. A resort
>> is not operated by a single company, and access is not restricted.
>> R
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 11:09 +, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
>
> A resort is usually a town whos primary purpose is tourism. A resort
> is not operated by a single company, and access is not restricted.
> Resort should probably be avoided due to totally different meanings
> between BE and
gt; To: Jerry Clough - OSM ; "Tag discussion,
> strategy and related tools"
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2015, 0:08
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Camps
>
>
> On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:44 +, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
> >
> > It seems to me that the obvi
On 6 May 2015 at 10:56, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2015-05-05 23:35 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt :
>
>> The core question is: should this be a top level tag:
>>
>>leisure=camp_site
>>leisure=communal_activity_camp
>>leisure=caravan_site
>>
>> Or subtags:
>>leisure=camp_site
>>c
ategy and
related tools"
Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2015, 0:08
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Camps
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:44 +, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
>
> It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover
> camps organised for profit and by non-profits
On Wed May 6 11:49:39 2015 GMT+0100, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
> >
> > > ... very specific British connotations associated with
> > > holiday_camp.
> >
> > Yes, I would consider the british holiday camps would be better called
> > resorts (?). The permanent building being the clue.
> -1
On Wed May 6 00:08:17 2015 GMT+0100, David Bannon wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:44 +, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
> >
> > It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover
> > camps organised for profit and by non-profits would be
> > leisure=vacation_camp.
>
> I don't thi
2015-05-05 23:35 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt :
> The core question is: should this be a top level tag:
>
>leisure=camp_site
>leisure=communal_activity_camp
>leisure=caravan_site
>
> Or subtags:
>leisure=camp_site
>caravans=dedicated
>tents=yes
>communal_activity_camp=no
>
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:44 +, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
>
> It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover
> camps organised for profit and by non-profits would be
> leisure=vacation_camp.
I don't think 'vacation' or 'leisure' are good terms at all. A lot of
people use t
The core question is: should this be a top level tag:
leisure=camp_site
leisure=communal_activity_camp
leisure=caravan_site
Or subtags:
leisure=camp_site
caravans=dedicated
tents=yes
communal_activity_camp=no
sanitary_dump_station=no
leisure=camp_site
operator=Girl
:* Bryce Nesbitt
> *To:* "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 5 May 2015, 10:01
> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] Camps
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <
> dieterdre..
have seen quite simple hotels
described as resorts; and elsewhere it refers to holiday centres of the likes
of ClubMed.
Jerry
From: Bryce Nesbitt
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2015, 10:01
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Camps
On Tue, Ma
2015-05-05 11:01 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt :
> At a "campground" each camper is free to organize their time among their
> own group.
> At scout, military and summer camp there is a scheduled program campers
> are expected to participate in.
>
OK, agree, but still it would be bad tagging because it
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> organised_camp doesn't add any information compared to "camp", any kind of
> camp will be organised. (medical camp, refugee camp, detention camp, summer
> camp, military camp, ...)
>
Sure it adds information.
At a "campground" each c
2015-05-05 3:25 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . :
> > Too big a jump, I think. Bearing in mind it is under leisure, how about
>> 'organised_camp' ?
>> >
>>
>> May want to hold that for something else. . .
>>
>>
> Such as ?
>
organised_camp doesn't add any information compared to "camp", any kind of
camp w
Do we really need to tag activity type?
Religion, sports, or operator should take care of it.
There's not a a lot of Buddhism practice at my school camp (any at all?), nor
would I expect religion to be the activity - it is merely the operator or the
thing in common. I bet the people at the J
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:36 PM, John Willis wrote:
> I think this will best handled in operator for existing camp sites (plus
access=private) or possibly make a separate tag under school= for the
school camps - as those are usually very affiliated with the district or
region operating them.
+-0
On 4 May 2015 at 21:39, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> > On May 4, 2015, at 1:02 PM, pmailkeey .
> wrote:
> >
> > Too big a jump, I think. Bearing in mind it is under leisure, how about
> 'organised_camp' ?
> >
>
> May want to hold that for something else. . .
>
>
Such as ?
> In at least one forest area
.
>
> -1
> Too easily confused with campgrounds.
Yep, +1
>
> The core difference between a "summer camp" and a campground is that
> the former has organized communal activities,
> and probably one or more themes (kids, religion, archery, etc.), and
> probably restrictions on arrival and depar
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Mark Bradley
wrote:
> In the wiki under the leisure key group there is a value called
> "summer_camp." I would like to propose that the value be changed to simply
> "camp." Many of these camps operate year round. Also, the description
> refers to children and ado
> On May 4, 2015, at 1:02 PM, pmailkeey . wrote:
>
> Too big a jump, I think. Bearing in mind it is under leisure, how about
> 'organised_camp' ?
>
May want to hold that for something else. . .
In at least one forest area I know of the agency managing the area calls church
and scout camps
On 4 May 2015 at 12:50, Mark Bradley wrote:
> Greetings.
>
>
>
> In the wiki under the leisure key group there is a value called
> "summer_camp." I would like to propose that the value be changed to simply
> "camp." Many of these camps operate year round. Also, the description
> refers to chil
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 06:30:33 -0700
> From: Tod Fitch mailto:t...@fitchdesign.com> >
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org> >
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Camps
> Message-ID: mai
2015-05-04 15:30 GMT+02:00 Tod Fitch :
> Reading about a refugee situation the other day I realized that “camp” can
> mean quite different things in different contexts. So I’d be a bit leery
> about going from a fairly specific term to a more general one, even if I
> doubt that a refugee camp woul
Reading about a refugee situation the other day I realized that “camp” can mean
quite different things in different contexts. So I’d be a bit leery about going
from a fairly specific term to a more general one, even if I doubt that a
refugee camp would be tagged under leisure.
Perhaps, to be mo
Greetings.
In the wiki under the leisure key group there is a value called
"summer_camp." I would like to propose that the value be changed to simply
"camp." Many of these camps operate year round. Also, the description
refers to children and adolescents, but some of these camps also cater t
29 matches
Mail list logo
