2013/2/26 A.Pirard.Papou
>
>
> The specification I'm trying to suggest is exactly that.
> There is a gap in an OSM route and the sole idea is to bridge it.
> We must indicate "go from here to there in an unspecified way".
> It is just to
>
>- make sure that those who follow the route will go
On 2013-02-26 15:24, Erik Johansson wrote :
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:53 PM, A.Pirard.Papou
wrote:
maybe add the key "informal"=yes to the path? I do this for "spontaneous" ways
and it is also documented in the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:informal
And the other suggestions, m
On 2013-02-26 15:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote :
2013/2/23 A.Pirard.Papou
A non-way is not the best word to describe my idea and I also do not feel
comfortable with it.
It's sort of a "secret [winding] little passage" that one must follow on demand.
So, more than "informal=yes" (which I don't
2013/2/23 A.Pirard.Papou
>
> A non-way is not the best word to describe my idea and I also do not feel
> comfortable with it.
> It's sort of a "secret [winding] little passage" that one must follow on
> demand.
> So, more than "informal=yes" (which I don't understand well), it would be a
> stra
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:53 PM, A.Pirard.Papou
wrote:
> maybe add the key "informal"=yes to the path? I do this for "spontaneous"
> ways and it is also documented in the wiki:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:informal
>
> And the other suggestions, many thanks, sorry for not listing the
On 2013-02-23 20:02, Jo wrote :
It seems that you would like a specific role, which
you can add to 2 members of a route relation (I'd add it to the
two ways around your imaginary gap).
If you do it that way, you don't need a non-existing member. And
2013/2/23 Peter Wendorff
> Am 23.02.2013 20:02, schrieb Jo:
>
> It seems that you would like a specific role, which you can add to 2
>> members of a route relation (I'd add it to the two ways around your
>> imaginary gap).
>>
>> If you do it that way, you don't need a non-existing member. And yo
Am 23.02.2013 20:02, schrieb Jo:
It seems that you would like a specific role, which you can add to 2
members of a route relation (I'd add it to the two ways around your
imaginary gap).
If you do it that way, you don't need a non-existing member. And you
don't need to add nodes to a relation
It seems that you would like a specific role, which you can add to 2
members of a route relation (I'd add it to the two ways around your
imaginary gap).
If you do it that way, you don't need a non-existing member. And you don't
need to add nodes to a relation which consists of ways.
This doesn't
On 2013-02-22 12:10, Janko Mihelić wrote :
I'm not entirely sure I understood your question, but you shouldn't
map non-ways. Routers could be developed that route through non-ways,
if there is no cliff or something else in the way. A router could
route along the contour lines, to make the hike
Maybe if it's walking through grass, you could only put surface=grass on
the way, because that's all there is, grass (or gravel or sand, whatever).
You could put that grass in a hiking route. That means there are no cliffs,
water, rocks or something else on the way, only grass you have to walk
thro
On 2/23/13 8:34 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
This UK meaning of "footpad" is the only one that I, as an American,
was familiar with. I had come across it in older books.
same here. it's not commonly used in the US today, but shows up in the
literature, so it's not
entirely unfamiliar.
richard
ael wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 09:37:13AM +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:29 AM, John F. Eldredge
> wrote:
> > > Footpath, not footpad. A footpad is a type of robber. If I saw a
> path marked as highway=footpad, it would suggest that the path is
> through a high
2013/2/22 Steve Bennett :
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:29 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
>> Footpath, not footpad. A footpad is a type of robber. If I saw a path
>> marked as highway=footpad, it would suggest that the path is through a
>> high-crime area, and you are likely to be mugged.
>
> Hmm,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 09:37:13AM +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:29 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> > Footpath, not footpad. A footpad is a type of robber. If I saw a path
> > marked as highway=footpad, it would suggest that the path is through a
> > high-crime area, an
Hi Jo,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Jo wrote:
> pad is Dutch for path. (It also means toad in Dutch, but that is, of course,
> unrelated)
>
> In English I only knew pad as something to jot on. Like a notepad.
>
> Maybe you should add those other meanings to Wiktionary.org,
Good suggestion. T
Jo wrote:
> pad is Dutch for path. (It also means toad in Dutch, but that is, of
> course, unrelated)
>
> In English I only knew pad as something to jot on. Like a notepad.
>
> Maybe you should add those other meanings to Wiktionary.org,
>
> Jo
>
> 2013/2/22 Steve Bennett
>
> > On Sat, Feb
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:29 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> Footpath, not footpad. A footpad is a type of robber. If I saw a path
> marked as highway=footpad, it would suggest that the path is through a
> high-crime area, and you are likely to be mugged.
Hmm, it must be a fairly uncommonly use
Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Erik Johansson
> wrote:
> > I feel dirty every time I do that, they are usually tagged as
> > surface=mud.. :-) Basically I map them if there really is a path
> > there and it seems usefull, even though it's clearly not a
> designated
> >
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Erik Johansson wrote:
> I feel dirty every time I do that, they are usually tagged as
> surface=mud.. :-) Basically I map them if there really is a path
> there and it seems usefull, even though it's clearly not a designated
> path.
There definitely should be a
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> 2013/2/22 Janko Mihelić
>>
>> I'm not entirely sure I understood your question, but you shouldn't map
>> non-ways. Routers could be developed that route through non-ways, if there
>> is no cliff or something else in the way. A rou
2013/2/22 Janko Mihelić
> I'm not entirely sure I understood your question, but you shouldn't map
> non-ways. Routers could be developed that route through non-ways, if there
> is no cliff or something else in the way. A router could route along the
> contour lines, to make the hike through fores
I'm not entirely sure I understood your question, but you shouldn't map
non-ways. Routers could be developed that route through non-ways, if there
is no cliff or something else in the way. A router could route along the
contour lines, to make the hike through forest easier. But if there is no
path,
Hello world,
It can happen for a hiking route, maybe others, to go across a non-way.
One may for example get people across some land without a path or
officially start and end a hike in the middle of a parking lot.
What must we do:
* create a pseudo way and what are the tags?
* more likely
24 matches
Mail list logo
