2010/10/25 Tobias Knerr :
> You already get very different tagging advice depending on whether you
> ask on, say, tagging, talk-de, the forum, or the wiki. So I question
> whether it's wise to create another mostly isolated group of people who
> will start to breed their own, incompatible interpret
At least in my own irc chat room, the tagging advice will be consistant :-)
But seriously, it's actually easier to emalgimate 10(or so) external
dataset schemas into a cohesive Universal Schema.
then after, I make the SchemaTroll2osm.csv file available where
only osm tags need to be changed.
Sam Vekemans wrote:
> I'm happy to report that we now have a dedicated IRC chat room, for
> the specific topic of 'tagging map features'.
You already get very different tagging advice depending on whether you
ask on, say, tagging, talk-de, the forum, or the wiki. So I question
whether it's wise to
Both the IRC and Mailing lists have their strengths and weaknesses,
the challenge we face is that ideas that are given from 1 mode of
communication are not translated into some better, and more clear
documentation.
Anyway, I'm off this list for a little while, as it appears that Serge
doesnt like
Yup :)
SchemaTroll 2.01 is definatly an attempt to create a universal Tagging
Schema, where the entire 'geo spatial community' (including osgeo
foundation and mapquest and commonmap) will benifit from a clearly
defined map feature system so that everyone can easily convert their
own schema across t
On 25/10/2010 00:26, Sam Vekemans wrote:
Hi,
Would calling it 'Open Map Features' make it a bit more clear for everyone?
As this IRC chat room can cover more general chat (about map features)
so it will attract the wider geo community to participate.
Err.. My point was about the inadequacies of
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Sam Vekemans
wrote:
> Would calling it 'Open Map Features' make it a bit more clear for everyone?
> As this IRC chat room can cover more general chat (about map features)
> so it will attract the wider geo community to participate.
Sam,
Will you just be honest w
Hi,
Would calling it 'Open Map Features' make it a bit more clear for everyone?
As this IRC chat room can cover more general chat (about map features)
so it will attract the wider geo community to participate.
Thanks,
Sam
On 10/24/10, Dave F. wrote:
> On 24/10/2010 05:15, Sam Vekemans wrote:
>>
On 24/10/2010 05:15, Sam Vekemans wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm happy to report that we now have a dedicated IRC chat room, for
the specific topic of 'tagging map features'.
I'm afraid I don't see the benefit of IRC for OSM.
It produces knee jerk reactions & you only discuss with other people in
yo
Hi everyone!
I'm happy to report that we now have a dedicated IRC chat room, for
the specific topic of 'tagging map features'.
This IRC chat is designed to work as an extention of the tagging
mailing list and the main osm mailing list, as well as the various
applications which work with map featu
10 matches
Mail list logo
